I hear you Livingdead70. It's a mental block to some degree I guess. Rock music is an image building business but makes no claim in suggesting any of it has to be true. If putting those four guys in the studio makes it real, so be it. But in truth that has seldom been the case. All that matters is whether you like the product. If you don't like Paul or Gene personally, then don't support them. I've met Gene twice; Paul and Ace once. All were great experiences but I don't think I'm qualified to say I know them. I like their product, but I try not to personalize it like I need to know if they give in the same offering plate I do. I guarantee you they don't have any qualms about their perspective. One thing is for sure... When that album comes out, it will be a REAL KISS record and it will sound like Ace and Peter are on it, just like it did in the 70's.


Yeah, Kiss has evolved through the years to follow industry trends, but unfortunately that is the business. What I've always thought interesting is how Kiss has tried to repeat the formula of Destroyer in different segments of their career. What most people don't realize is that Destroyer was a slow seller until a radio DJ flipped the single of Detroit Rock City over and started to play Beth. Had that not happened, we may not have been talking about that album with the kind of love you hear these days. The band even refused to talk to the producer Ezrin after it's initial slow sales. They resented him for the approach which was viewed as "radical" at the time. But in many ways Destroyer is a time piece. Ballads like Beth were rampant in the 70's so mainstream audiences flocked to this record when they heard that song and, for those reasons, the album went platinum.
Trey you and I certainly agree on this point. 
Comment