The Mego Museum needs your help!
The Mego Museum needs your help!

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Star Trek: Discovery

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • palitoy
    replied
    Great piece about Discovery, written by somebody no stranger to Mego or Star Trek. Zach's grandparents owned Parkdale Novelty, Mego's Canadian arm.

    Leave a comment:


  • JRT!
    replied
    But a LOT of times a pilot isn't really that good,it's just the introduction to something that COULD get better. I usually watch the pilot for a new show,and the first two or three epiosdes after that,to get a better feel for it. If by then I don't like it,I drop it from my watch list,lol! There are of course shows I never bother to watch at all,but that has more to do with liking the setting,genre,etc. But I'm REALLY looking forward to this one! And I guess I should've said,I,for ONE,in my post. Not,guess I'm the only one,lol.

    Leave a comment:


  • emeraldknight47
    replied
    As with most new science fiction shows, whether they're TREK based or not, I'll give the pilot a looksee and go from there. If nothing in said pilot grabs a hold of me enough to draw me back in, then I simply won't watch anymore. Pretty cut and dried.

    Leave a comment:


  • palitoy
    replied
    I'm in for the pilot, I like to check things out and you know, make up my own mind. None of what i see here (minor retcons, Klingons changing etc) didn't happen when TNG came out, I remember the first year fans hated the hell out of it and now it's beloved, so this too could pass.

    Leave a comment:


  • JRT!
    replied
    I did read all the comments,a very mixed bag,lol!

    Leave a comment:


  • The Bat
    replied
    I'm out!

    Leave a comment:


  • Hector
    replied
    No, you are not the only one...read all the comments...

    I'm in...

    Leave a comment:


  • JRT!
    replied
    Well guess I'm the only one who's REALLY looking forward to this and not going totally OC with the complaints I see on other sites,lol! Looking forward to Orville as well. And even Galaxy Quest! lol!

    Leave a comment:


  • hedrap
    replied
    I bailed on this after the CBS upfront presentation. The reasoning behind it is all wrong.

    I'm sure it will have some interesting ideas, but in reality it's the origin of Abram's Trekverse under the guise of TOS.

    Leave a comment:


  • fallensaviour
    replied
    Originally posted by sprytel
    The arrowhead in TOS is the assignment patch.I thought the phasers were done the right way. The uniforms, the Klingons, and now the family of the main character... seem to have less respect for the established canon.
    My exact thoughts and feelings and for these reasons I'm out!!!
    The actual nail in the coffin is a tie between the Klingons and the federation uniforms.

    Leave a comment:


  • enyawd72
    replied
    Originally posted by LonnieFisher
    It's being rated TV-MA. I think that is a mistake.
    I think the entire show is a mistake. It misses the point entirely of what Star Trek is. This garbage is no more Star Trek than adding CGI lightsabers to a Three Stooges short and calling it Star Wars.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sideshow Spock
    replied
    Originally posted by LonnieFisher
    It's being rated TV-MA. I think that is a mistake.
    Not a big deal.



    Still, there will be more edginess on Discovery than on, say, The Next Generation. “I’m not saying we’re not doing some violent things or doing a tiny bit of language,” Harberts said. “But what’s important to the creative team is the legacy of the show — which is passed down from mother to daughter, from father to son, from brother to brother. We want to make sure we’re not creating a show that fans can’t share with their families. You have to honor what the franchise is. I would say we’re not going much beyond hard PG-13.”

    Leave a comment:


  • LonnieFisher
    replied
    It's being rated TV-MA. I think that is a mistake.

    Leave a comment:


  • LonnieFisher
    replied
    Deleted comments...
    Last edited by LonnieFisher; Jul 29, '17, 7:32 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • sprytel
    replied
    Originally posted by Sideshow Spock
    Both Rodenberry and TOS producer Bob Justman stated back in the day that the Enterprise insignia was always intended for all Starfleet personnel, and the differing insignia seen in some eps were production errors or worn by crew of Federation vessels that weren't a part of Starfleet.
    I'm not debating he said that... but it simply isn't true.

    The arrowhead in TOS is the assignment patch. The Constellation, the Defiant, the Exeter... they all wear a different insignia. Starfleet Command, when depicted, wear yet a different insignia still. Since reusing existing Enterprise uniforms would have been far easier than creating new insignias, it is ridiculous to think that these were production errors. (As an aside, I love the Constellation's isnginia looking like an old timey sailing knot. Especially given the name was supposed to be a nod back to the original US Navy warship.) But outside of the most hardcore Trek fans, most do not know there were other insignias in TOS... to most people, that arrowhead *is* the symbol of Star Trek. So I get why they did it.

    I thought the phasers were done the right way. They have the basic look that most casual fans expect from a phaser, but incorporate the triple barrel look from the Cage. It may not exactly fit the timeline, but it showed they were trying. The uniforms, the Klingons, and now the family of the main character... seem to have less respect for the established canon.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
😀
🥰
🤢
😎
😡
👍
👎