Why is this site any more believable than Wikipedia? One site is an open posting site with arguably inadequate credibilty checking, but still forces attribution of sources. The other is a private site that does not disclose authors or citations of any kind for the "data" they disclose. They do however disclose clear bias in their mission statement, which, in addition to lack of attribution, makes me trust this site even less than Wikipedia. Just because someone puts "Council" at the end of their title, and publishes on the Internet on their own website, doesn't engender any credibility. "It must be true because I read it online" makes even less sense than "It must be true because I read it on Wikipedia".
Back to EMCE - I'm buying three GAs, and damn the cost and shipping. Who's with me?
Back to EMCE - I'm buying three GAs, and damn the cost and shipping. Who's with me?
Comment