New reality series Killing Bigfoot

[enyawd72]

This sounds interesting...definitely opens up the debate regarding the ethics of killing a Bigfoot to provide undisputed proof of their existence. If they are a species of ape, they must at least be considered endangered.
If they are a type of primitive human, wouldn't killing one be considered murder?

And before there are any responses saying they don't exist...They do in fact exist. I know because I've seen one. The world's foremost forensic fingerprint specialist has confirmed that at least some of the footprint casts are 100% genuine. He even determined that separate casts taken 20 years and 250 miles apart were likely from the same animal. That's just spooky.

To believe that every single eyewitness report, footprint, Native American story, etc....thousands and thousands of them going back hundreds of years...must be a hoax or mis-identification. That is just statistically impossible. If even ONE footprint is genuine...ONE sighting...then it's real.

[alex]

Oh please tell us your tale.

[Mikey]

Based on a book by Bill O'Reilly

[enyawd72]

Oh please tell us your tale.

I sent you a PM.

[J.B.]

I sent you a PM.

Did that PM consist of 2 words?

[enyawd72]

Did that PM consist of 2 words?

Huh? Please explain...

[TrekStar]

Killing Bigfoot is just another fictitious nonsense television show, it's simple entertainment, just like Mountain Monsters and Alaska Monsters and those other fake shows, a group of backwoods yahoos with hunting rifles supposedly chasing Bigfoot or whatever other monsters are out there, people off camera with recording devices playing howls, yells, screams
or someone in a costume runs across the camera and the film or video is always mysteriously blurry or shakes.

I remember watching another phony show where they actually captured Bigfoot in a cage and showed the thing
it was nothing more than Hollywood special effects, and oh by the way the cage latch wasn't properly locked and
Bigfoot escaped and the shows characters had to act upset.

I do enjoy watching the program Finding Bigfoot, at least there's an effort being made to actually make it believable
and worth watching and the girl on the team is a skeptic and makes good points about her opinions, but have they
found it yet? maybe there's a reason.

To many misidentifications and hoaxers and people simply lying make it difficult for people who want to believe
but can't, some of these shows just have paid amateur actors reading a script, nothing wrong with all this, it's
fun entertainment, take it for what it's worth.

[TomStrong]

This sounds interesting...definitely opens up the debate regarding the ethics of killing a Bigfoot to provide undisputed proof of their existence. If they are a species of ape, they must at least be considered endangered.
If they are a type of primitive human, wouldn't killing one be considered murder?

And before there are any responses saying they don't exist...They do in fact exist. I know because I've seen one. The world's foremost forensic fingerprint specialist has confirmed that at least some of the footprint casts are 100% genuine. He even determined that separate casts taken 20 years and 250 miles apart were likely from the same animal. That's just spooky.

To believe that every single eyewitness report, footprint, Native American story, etc....thousands and thousands of them going back hundreds of years...must be a hoax or mis-identification. That is just statistically impossible. If even ONE footprint is genuine...ONE sighting...then it's real.

Sounds like an interesting show. And i think it's awesome you've seen one! Ohio grassman?

[LonnieFisher]

[GlobalObserver]

[enyawd72]

^And posts like that are exactly why so many people who have experiences never come forward.

Doesn't matter. A handful of scientists and other highly intelligent and dedicated people have staked their personal and professional reputations on the fact that these animals do exist. If you actually bothered to research the subject as thoroughly as I have instead of being insulting you might actually learn something.

Do you honestly believe that EVERY single report, footprint, audio and video recording is a hoax? We're talking THOUSANDS of them going back hundreds of years...all faked? The state of Ohio has over 8 million acres of forest. That is a HUGE amount of habitat for an intelligent creature to hide in. There are just too many factors that support these claims.

For instance, can you please try to explain how Native Americans hundreds of years ago accurately described and drew pieces of art depicting large apes when gorillas weren't even discovered until 1902 on a different continent? They could only do that if they had seen them.

Can you also explain foot and hand prints found that contain dermal ridges which cannot be faked? These have undeniably been determined to be authentic. Jimmy Chilcutt of the Conroe, Texas police department is the country's foremost forensic fingerprint specialist and has fingerprinted and studied every species of great ape. He has stated for the record that there is an unknown species of said ape living in North America.

Yes, there are hoaxers out there, and people trying to turn what is supposed to be legitimate research into a carnival sideshow for entertainment purposes, which is unfortunate. However, there are enough people out there who take this subject seriously. Those people who are dedicated to discovery through proper scientific exploration. We will have our day. It's only a matter of time.

[toyman]

I have always wondered about this and watch about everything I can about them since I was a kid and heard about bigfoot in the 70's. I hope one day there is proof they exist and the doubters are proven wrong. Dwayne id really love to hear about your experience if you ever decide to share details about it.

[LonnieFisher]

How old were you when you saw it, and how close were you? And what exactly did it look like?

[GlobalObserver]

https://www.csicop.org/sb/show/experiments_cast_doubt_on_bigfoot_evidence

[enyawd72]

^That link proves nothing. It's merely an attempt to discredit expert findings by a skeptic.

And you failed to answer my question regarding how Native Americans could have drawn accurate depictions of apes over 200 years before gorillas were even discovered...on another continent.

But, like always, you attack the experts and conveniently ignore the points you can't argue.

Also...I would like you to state once and for all...do you believe that EVERY single report, cast, photo, video, and audio recording ever obtained spanning hundreds of years to be fake? Yes or No?