Help support the Mego Museum
Help support the Mego Museum

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

10 most historically innacurate films

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • thunderbolt
    Hi Ernie!!!
    • Feb 15, 2004
    • 34211

    #16
    Originally posted by csstuba
    Here are a few that come to mind:
    Peggy Sue Got Married
    Starship Troopers
    Dawn of the Dead (1978)
    Friday the 13th Part VI: Jason Lives
    Showgirls
    The Blob (1958 Version). McQueen the bomb though.
    They Live
    Wow, what a list.
    You must try to generate happiness within yourself. If you aren't happy in one place, chances are you won't be happy anyplace. -Ernie Banks

    Comment

    • Bizarro Amy
      Formerly known as Del
      • Dec 12, 2004
      • 3336

      #17
      Sure am glad I caught this one before it disappeared.
      Hey! Where's the waiter with the water for my daughter?

      Check out my customs!
      https://www.facebook.com/BizarroAmy
      http://www.tumblr.com/blog/bizarroamy

      Comment

      • Earth 2 Chris
        Verbose Member
        • Mar 7, 2004
        • 32929

        #18
        I think it's fun to catch modern items in historically set movies. Like a wristwatch on a guy in "Glory". Or one of my favorites, a modern telphone pole in the mini-series "Centenial", which was filmed just up north of me in Augusta, KY.

        Chris
        sigpic

        Comment

        • Mikey
          Verbose Member
          • Aug 9, 2001
          • 47258

          #19
          Originally posted by del
          Sure am glad I caught this one before it disappeared.
          That's true.....
          Wasn't this thread at least 3 pages long this morning ?
          Suddenly, it's down to 2 ......

          This THREAD is historically inacurate

          Comment

          • The Bat
            Batman Fanatic
            • Jul 14, 2002
            • 13412

            #20
            Well...I've read "Ceaser and Christ", by Wil Durant....and the only thing made up in "Gladitor"...was the character of Maximus...and the fact the the Romans never actually defeated the Germanians. The rest of the Characters were pulled from History. One Critic stated, that it was rediculous the a Ceaser would actually fight in the Gladitor Arena...but in fact, the REAL Komodus did enjoy fighting in the Games.

            But who cares if they moved History around a little bit to tell a story...it was a GREAT Movie!!
            sigpic

            Comment

            • toys2cool
              Ultimate Mego Warrior
              • Nov 27, 2006
              • 28605

              #21
              yeah but most of them are still bad *** if you ask me
              "Time to nut up or shut up" -Tallahassee

              http://ultimatewarriorcollection.webs.com/
              My stuff on facebook Incompatible Browser | Facebook

              Comment

              • johnmiic
                Adrift
                • Sep 6, 2002
                • 8427

                #22
                I don't think 2001 should have been included either but I guess what they are really saying is things didn't turn out like we expected. We have a space station but it is not the exciting, rotating, wheel in space like the film had. We have a space shuttle but not the reliable hypersonic space plane like the Orion clipper. Space travel is mostly for astronauts and not commercial passangers like many think it should be by now. We haven't sent people to Jupiter but if the moon Europa has oceans under the ice we might send people there to check it out. NASA does have plans on the table to send astronuats to survey Earth orbit crossing comets and asteroids. This was proposed in Arthur C. Clarke's third book in the series: 2063.

                Mike, JFK is not meant to be history but theory. Think of it like a murder mystery. There are many theories regarding the Kennedy assasination. This film is just the one favored by Oliver Stone. Only a small percentage of the American people think Oswald acted alone because there seems to be too many inconsitencies in the Warren Commission Report; mainly the Magic Bullet Theory.

                I'm surprised these films were not included as critics have cited them as being glaringly inaccurate and having oblvious gaffs:

                Mississippi Burning

                The Insider

                Pearl Harbor, starring Ben Affleck.

                Comment

                • grayhank
                  That Fisher Price Guy
                  • Feb 9, 2007
                  • 1134

                  #23
                  Originally posted by johnmiic
                  I'm surprised these films were not included as critics have cited them as being glaringly inaccurate and having oblvious gaffs:

                  Pearl Harbor, starring Ben Affleck.
                  No, that one's true...Ben Affleck was there...he's actually really really really old.
                  Scott D Thompson | Facebook

                  Comment

                  • Bo8a_Fett
                    Pat Troughton in disguise
                    • Nov 21, 2007
                    • 3738

                    #24
                    I don't mind inaccurate movies when they are made purely as entertainment as in something like "Master and Commander"or even "300" which was based on Frank Miller's take on the battle rather than a historically correct rendition. Artistic lisence is fine as long as they don't change the facts too much, but when they are deliberately showing a historical event and get it wrong it really bugs me.
                    How about ...
                    U 571
                    Marie Antoinette
                    Sands of Iwo Jima
                    First Knight
                    Robin Hood :Prince of Thieves
                    Titanic
                    Flyboys
                    ENGLISH AND DAMN PROUD OF IT British by birth....English by the grace of God. Yes Jamie...it is big isn't it....

                    Comment

                    • Bizarro Amy
                      Formerly known as Del
                      • Dec 12, 2004
                      • 3336

                      #25
                      If 2001 is on the list, shouldn't the movie version of 1984 be there too?
                      Hey! Where's the waiter with the water for my daughter?

                      Check out my customs!
                      https://www.facebook.com/BizarroAmy
                      http://www.tumblr.com/blog/bizarroamy

                      Comment

                      • Bo8a_Fett
                        Pat Troughton in disguise
                        • Nov 21, 2007
                        • 3738

                        #26
                        What really bugs me is when kids fall for the "hollywood" history and believe what they've seen is fact rather than learning proper history in school.
                        ...I have typed....
                        ENGLISH AND DAMN PROUD OF IT British by birth....English by the grace of God. Yes Jamie...it is big isn't it....

                        Comment

                        • Hector
                          el Hombre de Acero
                          • May 19, 2003
                          • 31852

                          #27
                          Originally posted by The Bat
                          Well...I've read "Ceaser and Christ", by Wil Durant....and the only thing made up in "Gladitor"...was the character of Maximus...and the fact the the Romans never actually defeated the Germanians.
                          Well, Romans did indeed defeated them in spurts, meaning the Romans did manage to "pacify" certain regions of Germania.

                          So that battle in Gladiator could've been one of those successes.

                          However after the Battle of the Teutoburg Forest (were three Roman legions were crushed)...Rome abandoned all further attempts to conquer Germania.
                          sigpic

                          Comment

                          • johnmiic
                            Adrift
                            • Sep 6, 2002
                            • 8427

                            #28
                            Originally posted by Bo8a_Fett
                            What really bugs me is when kids fall for the "hollywood" history and believe what they've seen is fact rather than learning proper history in school.
                            ...I have typed....
                            That's OK because if they watch the film instead of studying the real history they'll just fail the test at school. That'll learn 'em!

                            Comment

                            • Vortigern99
                              Scholar/Gentleman/Weirdo
                              • Jul 2, 2006
                              • 1539

                              #29
                              Originally posted by MegoRonin
                              When it comes to accuracy, I like an objective and balanced source of information like FOX news or the Onion.
                              I'm starting to appreciate your dry wit, MegoRonin.

                              Comment

                              • Evel KMego
                                Museum Daredevil
                                • Apr 26, 2006
                                • 1444

                                #30
                                Why is Meatballs not on this list?

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                😀
                                🥰
                                🤢
                                😎
                                😡
                                👍
                                👎