>This is a 2D interpretation of that
Yeah. It's not that different, simplified face (probably for the transition to line as opposed to digital skin based) and a lot more sparkly.
>I'm not going to start a protest group over it
....but SOMEONE will. That's the downside of the internets; it makes it harder to ignore the concerned citizen types.
>It does look like a concentrated effort to keep the characters relevant
And streamline the designs so's to better conform to the current standards. It makes animation (especially CGI) or toy production a LOT easier when you work off standardized templates. When you look at the Disney Princesses, you're combining characters from seventy years of cartoons. It takes some juggling to make them look similar enough that the older ones don't look like extraterrestrial invaders from a dimension where physics works differently.
Don C.
Yeah. It's not that different, simplified face (probably for the transition to line as opposed to digital skin based) and a lot more sparkly.
>I'm not going to start a protest group over it
....but SOMEONE will. That's the downside of the internets; it makes it harder to ignore the concerned citizen types.
>It does look like a concentrated effort to keep the characters relevant
And streamline the designs so's to better conform to the current standards. It makes animation (especially CGI) or toy production a LOT easier when you work off standardized templates. When you look at the Disney Princesses, you're combining characters from seventy years of cartoons. It takes some juggling to make them look similar enough that the older ones don't look like extraterrestrial invaders from a dimension where physics works differently.
Don C.
Comment