Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Batman v Superman Latest News
Collapse
X
-
You must try to generate happiness within yourself. If you aren't happy in one place, chances are you won't be happy anyplace. -Ernie Banks -
Comment
-
That Kimmel clip is pretty funny and just furthers the "galactically stupid" title that Lois Lane was given in "Lois and Clark." Fingers crossed that the movie can be at least that entertaining.sigpic Oh then, what's this? Big flashy lighty thing, that's what brought me here! Big flashy lighty things have got me written all over them. Not actually. But give me time. And a crayon.Comment
-
Early critic buzz is positive. That matters as it's not fanboy reddit rants.
Jena Malone's "Is she Carrie Kelly or Babs Gordon" scenes have been cut and moved to Blu-Ray...specifically the R-Rated version. I see that implying she's Oracle.
Flash interacts with Bats in BvS....
...But Green Lantern is not in BvS....or Justice League......and possibly the Justice League Sequel!!!
Here's the money quote: Emphasis mine.
"[Green Lantern] is an incredible character. He's actually multiple incredible characters. There's real opportunity there. We didn't do a great job on that first Green Lantern movie. This is a character who deserves to be treated in the same way that Batman and Superman and Wonder Woman are being treated now, which is with great reverence. I guess I can say to the Green Lantern fans: if they can be patient with us, I think they'll be really happy."
But WB has never wanted him in such a secondary role, so the only way they were going to finance is if they got another huge star attached to Shazam, and they haven't been able to. WB probably tried to shift/buyout his Black Adam contract, but since the production was originally set up at New Line, (who still exists even post-WB merger), all contractual obligations are valid. I know that from the Iron Man fiasco and what Avi Arad had to pull to get the rights away, as WB never intended to finance it which kept it shelved, aka "in development". Producers are independent players not employees, so they're not inclined to simply hand over property for the good of the company. When you've got one of the last actual stars who can turn out an audience under contract, and a cheap contract compared to his current rates, it's gold. The probably wanted producer credits on JLA, which is never going to happen as that splits the percentages even more.
But now, WB can have a verbal agreement in place and wait it out. To not include GL in the first JLA is risking fanboy wrath, but if they're doing it because they can fill the role with a real showstopper, than all will be forgiven. Also factor in how the next GL film is about the Corps and I can see Rock playing Stewart to a Guy Gardner.Comment
-
Definitely in agreement that, after multiple viewings, MOS is a fitting entry into the Superman mythology (with a few minor quibbles I have discussed elsewhere on these boards). Is is a "perfect" Superman movie? By no means; it casts Superman into a much darker place than the character was ever meant to inhabit. Did it deserve better than 56% on RT? IMHO, yes, it does, but movies critics have a tendency to have a lack of independent thought, especially when it comes to superhero movies. One critic may sing a movie's praises only to be drowned out by a herd of "sheep" who are finding it easier to follow the path of least resistance and add to the cacophony of naysayers and those unwilling to look past previous efforts.
Is MOS, as Hector says, better than A:AoU? I'd would likely have to say yes simply due to the fact that Whedon, while his focus was laser sharp on the first Avengers movie, sadly found his vision muddled and confused in AoU while an actor who should have delivered an Ultron who was easily as chilling and menacing as any super villain can be, for some reason, whether it be script or interpretation or even direction, made that villain far too unimposing and, therefore, impotent as a threat.
I've only seen IM3 once, so I can't really say too much about it (it usually requires at least three or four viewings before stuff really starts to gel in my head) other than the fact that for a movie called IRON MAN, we saw very little OF Iron Man and a LOT of RDJ's ego being stroked. I would therefore have to agree with Hector again that MOS was, indeed, better than Man of Iron III.Last edited by emeraldknight47; Mar 13, '16, 12:10 PM.sigpic Oh then, what's this? Big flashy lighty thing, that's what brought me here! Big flashy lighty things have got me written all over them. Not actually. But give me time. And a crayon.Comment
-
For the love of god almighty, don't watch Iron Man 3 again...you may never recover, lol.
The RT Audience rates MOS at 76%, that's the one that truly counts anyway...the fans, not paid critics...but then again, they rated Iron Man 3 at 79%...so no one counts but me...
Last edited by Hector; Mar 12, '16, 1:44 AM.sigpicComment
-
Key statement, "So no one counts but me!" Who cares what anyone rates a movie or how much they like or dislike it, watch and enjoy what you like. Ratings are all crap as we all enjoy different things. We all razz on each other for our different tastes but mostly it's all in fun.Comment
-
I find it funny, I come into this thread expecting to read about BvS but every other post is about a Marvel movie. I jump into the Civil War thread and nary a post about a DC property in it.
BvS better be good, but it feels like I've seen the movie already with all of the trailers and info purposely leaked about the plot etc...Comment
-
Visit my wiki site:
Comic Books in the Media
To view my custom works of both JLU and Megos go to:
Monitor_EP Deviantart page
Action Jackson Road Trip logComment
Comment