If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Sounds consistent with the company's direction. DC has already raped all their heroes of their rich history, so the faithful readers are accustom to taking it in the rear.
Aquaman's married (to a woman) and in past continuity had a child with this woman, and sired another child by another woman. Not saying that gay men don't do that, but I doubt it's him. Goes to show how much research MSN does.
But as for this whole thing...this just proves that DC will do anything for a buck or publicity. Announcing it like this proves it. If the story evolved into this, fine. If they are forcing this on a long established character just for some press and a quick buck...wrong.
Sounds consistent with the company's direction. DC has already raped all their heroes of their rich history, so the faithful readers are accustom to taking it in the rear.
If sales are laggin, get your queens a draggin! Seriously, this is another insane publicity stunt. I'm all for new gay characters if they want, but is it really necessary to "out" a character that's been around for 70 years?
Are Batman and Robin really more than just old chums?
Aquaman's been gay for years. (Just kidding!)
Wonder Woman's been a bondage queen for years...maybe.
Flash...nuff said there.
Superman? Nah...they wouldn't, would they? And if they did...would he be SUPER-gay? LOL
I'm going with Green Lantern, just because his calendar featured twelve months of shirtless Ryan Reynolds photos.
Leave a comment: