>I've never cared for manga, anime, ANY of that style stuff.
But that leads to the qunundrum.... it doesn't appeal to you, so you've probably never perused any significant amount of it, so your chances of finding something you LIKE is pretty small.... even given the huge diversity the medium has.
I don't like using the term "manga" for Japanese comics. In the minds of most people it denotes a style, which isn't quite right. Kinda like when I used "TV." "TV" covers a LOT of ground: news, doccumentaries, Three's Company, the prisioner, Star Trek, All My Children, Beanie and Cecil, Hill Street Blues, Shot at Love W. Tela Tequila, the Venture Brothers, Hannity and Friends, National Geographic Presents.... To lump all those into ONE term is insane; but that's what a lot of the non-fans do with "manga."
Which is cool; you like what you like and the world isn't gonna come to an end one way or another. Personally it's a problem, 'cos it limits how much of a discussion I can have with people about comics. I can debate the merits of superheroes 'cos I've READ them. Lots of them. (I worked in a comic shop and people would come in and CHALLENGE my knowledge....) But it's tough for other people to retort any "manga" related point 'cos they've never really read any. "I don't like it" is about the best you get, and even THAT'S difficult to quantify beyond "the eyes are weird" without offering any examples.
I got the same problem with Archie, Harvey, and other "lesser" comic branches. Since I was a kid and got into comics back during the early 80's boom it's been a constant frustration how narrowly defined most people's definition of "comic" is. And I think we're seeing the fallout nowadays; Marvel, DC and sometimes Image have become intellectually inbred because the current crop of producers, who were the previous crop of fans, have such narrow parameters it's difficult (if not impossible) for them to REALLY rejuvenmate their books 'cos they've got nothing to add. From the fan end, look at the complaints: I wish it was more like the OLD book, I wish it was like when *name here* was doing it, MY Batman wouldn't call people a ******.... NOBODY'S looking forward. NOBODY'S adding to the mix.
....which kinda brings us back to this thread: what would you ADD to Wonder Woman to make her pertinent again?
*WEIRD ASIDE: A friend of mine spent a lot of time in Japan, and attended a few comic conventions. He noted that the atendees were OVERWHELMINGLY female.
*WEIRD ASIDE TOO: I think the MOST anime DC show was the "Teen Titans." Seriously, they ripped scenes right from different Japanese cartoons. (I've been told, mostly "Cooly Fooly.")
....and a lot of you guys liked the Titans....
Don C.
But that leads to the qunundrum.... it doesn't appeal to you, so you've probably never perused any significant amount of it, so your chances of finding something you LIKE is pretty small.... even given the huge diversity the medium has.
I don't like using the term "manga" for Japanese comics. In the minds of most people it denotes a style, which isn't quite right. Kinda like when I used "TV." "TV" covers a LOT of ground: news, doccumentaries, Three's Company, the prisioner, Star Trek, All My Children, Beanie and Cecil, Hill Street Blues, Shot at Love W. Tela Tequila, the Venture Brothers, Hannity and Friends, National Geographic Presents.... To lump all those into ONE term is insane; but that's what a lot of the non-fans do with "manga."
Which is cool; you like what you like and the world isn't gonna come to an end one way or another. Personally it's a problem, 'cos it limits how much of a discussion I can have with people about comics. I can debate the merits of superheroes 'cos I've READ them. Lots of them. (I worked in a comic shop and people would come in and CHALLENGE my knowledge....) But it's tough for other people to retort any "manga" related point 'cos they've never really read any. "I don't like it" is about the best you get, and even THAT'S difficult to quantify beyond "the eyes are weird" without offering any examples.
I got the same problem with Archie, Harvey, and other "lesser" comic branches. Since I was a kid and got into comics back during the early 80's boom it's been a constant frustration how narrowly defined most people's definition of "comic" is. And I think we're seeing the fallout nowadays; Marvel, DC and sometimes Image have become intellectually inbred because the current crop of producers, who were the previous crop of fans, have such narrow parameters it's difficult (if not impossible) for them to REALLY rejuvenmate their books 'cos they've got nothing to add. From the fan end, look at the complaints: I wish it was more like the OLD book, I wish it was like when *name here* was doing it, MY Batman wouldn't call people a ******.... NOBODY'S looking forward. NOBODY'S adding to the mix.
....which kinda brings us back to this thread: what would you ADD to Wonder Woman to make her pertinent again?
*WEIRD ASIDE: A friend of mine spent a lot of time in Japan, and attended a few comic conventions. He noted that the atendees were OVERWHELMINGLY female.
*WEIRD ASIDE TOO: I think the MOST anime DC show was the "Teen Titans." Seriously, they ripped scenes right from different Japanese cartoons. (I've been told, mostly "Cooly Fooly.")
....and a lot of you guys liked the Titans....
Don C.
Comment