The Mego Museum needs your help!
The Mego Museum needs your help!

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Another Exclusive Sneak Peek at Wave 2

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • enyawd72
    replied
    And here's the actual Creature from the Black Lagoon costume in full color...not colorized. The lips are RED. They always were. The posters got it right.

    Leave a comment:


  • enyawd72
    replied
    Originally posted by Liu Bei
    They showed up green in advertising by mistake.
    As an expert on the subject, I can assure you it did not. Just as people asserted for YEARS that the Creature from the Black Lagoon didn't have red lips. The full color Life magazine photos say otherwise. I am fully aware of the makeup and lighting techniques used for black and white film, and what the filmmakers intentions were for the monster to appear in a black and white film, however, Son of Frankenstein was originally going to be shot in color. There exists color test footage of Karloff in full makeup as he was intended to appear in color, and he is GREEN. There is no question about it whatsoever.



    It is no different than George Reeves chocolate brown and light grey Superman costume. Although these colors were used to enhance it's appearance in black and white, we all know the intended colors are red and blue. The same applies here.

    Leave a comment:


  • thunderbolt
    replied
    Originally posted by PNGwynne
    I like Pantone 579 as a skin tone for the Monster. B&W cinematography notwithstanding and speaking as a make-up artist, I think it's good for the shelf appeal and characterization of the classic monsters to have varying skin tones.
    Gives them a little more toy appeal to me. I think greyish Drac and Green Frankie will make a nice pair. Throw in a orange-y brown Wolfman and you got a pretty fun looking UM Trinity

    Leave a comment:


  • Mary Canary
    replied
    I like him green.

    Leave a comment:


  • PNGwynne
    replied
    I like Pantone 579 as a skin tone for the Monster. B&W cinematography notwithstanding and speaking as a make-up artist, I think it's good for the shelf appeal and characterization of the classic monsters to have varying skin tones.

    Leave a comment:


  • Liu Bei
    replied
    Originally posted by enyawd72
    That's not entirely accurate...the monster was depicted as being green on nearly all of Universal's advertising and movie posters beginning with "Bride" in 1935. This remained consistent all the way up until Abbott & Costello Meet Frankenstein in 1948, and even with the Munsters.

    I understand that the color marketing/advertising for Frankenstein showed him with green skin. I referenced it in my initial post. Early Dracula posters portrayed him with green skin as well.

    My point was not that this didn't happen, but rather it was inaccurate. The green makeup was used to have Drac and the Monster show up as ashy white/grey corpse colored monsters on screen.

    As a fan of silent era films in particular, and b&w film in general, I can tell you this was common practice. It's why Matt Dillon originally wore a pinkish/red shirt in Gunsmoke.

    Frankenstein's Monster (and Dracula) showed up as white/grey on film by design. They showed up green in advertising by mistake. For Frankenstein the mistake persisted and passed into pop culture, just as the upright arms while walking did (even though this scene appeared only in Bela's portrayal after the Monster was blinded.)

    Leave a comment:


  • enyawd72
    replied
    Originally posted by Liu Bei
    Bit of a tangent, but Frankenstein's Monster is technically supposed to be white/grey, not green. Green makeup was used on both Karloff and Lugosi because it showed up white/grey in black and white film. Color photographs of the actors in costume led to the public perception of them being green, Frankenstein more than Drac. Drac only suffered from being portrayed as green in some early advertising before it was corrected. Frankenstein's Monster was not so lucky.
    That's not entirely accurate...the monster was depicted as being green on nearly all of Universal's advertising and movie posters beginning with "Bride" in 1935. This remained consistent all the way up until Abbott & Costello Meet Frankenstein in 1948, and even with the Munsters.

    Last edited by enyawd72; Sep 2, '18, 11:03 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • MIB41
    replied
    Originally posted by Liu Bei
    Bit of a tangent, but Frankenstein's Monster is technically supposed to be white/grey, not green. Green makeup was used on both Karloff and Lugosi because it showed up white/grey in black and white film. Color photographs of the actors in costume led to the public perception of them being green, Frankenstein more than Drac. Drac only suffered from being portrayed as green in some early advertising before it was corrected. Frankenstein's Monster was not so lucky.
    Here is an old thread from five years back, where our fellow member, Samurainoir, shared pics of the color guide for Frankenstein.


    Just received the EMCE Frankenstein and Wolf Man today, and while they look lovely, I couldn't help but think of how the modern style guide for Universal seems to have negatively impacted some color choices. The worst offender? Frankenstein's GREEN jacket. Green? Where did this come from? This dates back to the mid '90s

    Leave a comment:


  • Iron Mego
    replied
    I like the green, as inaccurate as it is, because it makes me think of putrid flesh!

    Leave a comment:


  • Liu Bei
    replied
    Bit of a tangent, but Frankenstein's Monster is technically supposed to be white/grey, not green. Green makeup was used on both Karloff and Lugosi because it showed up white/grey in black and white film. Color photographs of the actors in costume led to the public perception of them being green, Frankenstein more than Drac. Drac only suffered from being portrayed as green in some early advertising before it was corrected. Frankenstein's Monster was not so lucky.

    Leave a comment:


  • thunderbolt
    replied
    Originally posted by tjacwave50
    Now that there using Chaney Jr. for Ghost of Frankenstein, maybe they will use Bela for Igor and give him his spooky
    sounding horn?
    I am hoping they use the Bela likeness rights more than once. Igor, Murder Legendre would be two good ones.

    Leave a comment:


  • The Bat
    replied
    Now that I know it's Lon Chaney Jr...my hopes are high for a Wolfman. 😀

    Leave a comment:


  • Mary Canary
    replied
    I didn't get Dracula, but I can see myself getting Frankenstein. There's something fun about the odd mix of characters I can pick up - like why shouldn't I have a Frankenstein next to my Kelly Garrett, Sulu, and Action Jackson?

    Leave a comment:


  • TrekStar
    replied
    Originally posted by PNGwynne
    Far from my favorite Monster, but I'll get one. The Chaney license opens the opportunity for a Kharis figure, which is exciting.
    I hope so, the Chaney Mummy was the best, and maybe more Chaney for Son of Dracula too.

    Leave a comment:


  • TrekStar
    replied
    Originally posted by thunderbolt
    I thought it was going to be Bela since they have likeness rights for him. Seems like they would use it for more than just Drac.
    Now that there using Chaney Jr. for Ghost of Frankenstein, maybe they will use Bela for Igor and give him his spooky
    sounding horn?

    Leave a comment:

Working...
😀
🥰
🤢
😎
😡
👍
👎