If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
So now it's OK being overweight, which she is.. Bad job SI..
Isn't it called "Sports Illustrated"? She doesn't look very athletic to me. I think it was a poor choice.
I can guarantee that photo has been photoshopped to make her look better than she really does.
Last edited by LonnieFisher; Feb 19, '16, 12:47 AM.
Isn't it called "Sports Illustrated"? She doesn't look very athletic to me. I think it was a poor choice.
I can guarantee that photo has been photoshopped to make her look better than she really does.
sigpic Oh then, what's this? Big flashy lighty thing, that's what brought me here! Big flashy lighty things have got me written all over them. Not actually. But give me time. And a crayon.
There are, at least, 3 cover variations for this issue. One is Ashley Graham. Ronda Rousey is on another. Not sure who is the third...no doubt she is skinny with enough enhanced cleavage to please everyone else.
No exclusives and no chase figures, please - I'm Canadian!
Fat needs to be kept covered, not be on the cover.
Actually, that's not true at all. Rail thin women may be the current beauty standard, but it wasn't always so. Ever notice in all those renaissance paintings of nude women they are usually plump? Well, that was a sign of affluence (because the wealthy ate well) and was not only accepted, it was considered beautiful and encouraged.
Here are two different depictions of Venus...the Goddess of love, sex, fertility and desire...and she's pretty darn plump.
Comment