One word --- empathy
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Columbus Day, Redskins controversy and historical accuracy
Collapse
X
-
In Canada I was never taught about Columbus in a way that made him hero, so it seems a bit odd when I hear people think about him that way. I think it's fair to admire his accomplishments without making him a cartoon hero. He was an opportunist who did a lot of lousy things. Of course we are looking at him today with different values, so it's probably a bit unfair to make him a cartoon villain too.
Personally, having looked at both sides I don't buy the "people of god" thing. It's not like he could take snapshots of the Natives back with him, so it makes sense to me that he used the term Indian to describe the people he saw as a term that would be easily understood. Plus, I think if history shows us anything he was career minded about his voyages, and as far as I know he always thought he was close to finding a new trade route to Asia. So it makes sense to me that he was telling people back home that the people he found were the same race as the people of India. It helps with his whole sales pitch, no?
I think the term "Redskin" and things like the Cleveland Indians mascot are gross and make the fans of those teams look like fools. To be fair I'm not a sports fan and don't care anything about preserving sports history or anything like that. Still, the excuses all seem weak. It seems to me that sports team names have changed for lots of other reasons and people get over it pretty quickly.Last edited by Brazoo; Oct 15, '13, 11:44 AM.Comment
-
I think when you look at team names, you also need to look at the logos. I think that truly underscores whether the image is being thoughtful (or careless). I see allot of pride in the Redskin logo. I think it's an image of strength and courage. I like the slang use of the term Redskin because it denotes a degree of grit and toughness that compliments the logo.
When I look at the Indians, I clearly see a dated depiction that carries a derogatory image. If there is any professional franchise that should get a facelift, it's the Cleveland Indians.
Comment
-
You guys do have to admit, if there was a team called the blackskins and had a black man as a logo this would be a non issue -meaning everyone would agree it would be inappropriate.
Same with yellowskins and an Asian man logo.
The only reason it's not as big a deal for American Indians is they're not as organized - yet imoComment
-
I think when you look at team names, you also need to look at the logos. I think that truly underscores whether the image is being thoughtful (or careless). I see allot of pride in the Redskin logo. I think it's an image of strength and courage. I like the slang use of the term Redskin because it denotes a degree of grit and toughness that compliments the logo.
When I look at the Indians, I clearly see a dated depiction that carries a derogatory image. If there is any professional franchise that should get a facelift, it's the Cleveland Indians.
My Custom Figures
1 Corinthians 9:24 - Don’t you realize that in a race everyone runs, but only one person gets the prize? So run to win!Comment
-
Simply Put, this is an issue with American Indians and the Redskins. If they have a need to sit down and talk about it; EVERYONE else has no business talking about the name but them. Last I checked The Washington Redskins are a Privately run team. Politicians need to mind their business,Redskins have been around a long time. Politicians need to WORK with American Indian leaders to help them, find a solution to help them solve their issues. and better their communities.......I think this country has some REAL URGENT issues that Politicians need to solve in the next few days. than worrying about a teams name............Last edited by kingdom warrior; Oct 15, '13, 10:33 AM.Comment
-
There are probably a lot of Natives who don't care - so what? There are clearly a lot of Natives who are offended. Anyway, there's a long history of sports team name changs:
The Yankees, The Jets, The Wizards, the Astros...who even cares about these name changes now?
I'm reading that the Redskins didn't even start with that name. They were once The Braves, but changed their name in 1933 to avoid confusion with the baseball team. It's not exactly like they're talking about changing a sacred historical document, it's a dumb and offensive sports team name. Big deal.Last edited by Brazoo; Oct 15, '13, 12:16 PM.Comment
-
Comment
-
That's a pet peeve of mine these days.. all these baseball and football stadiums copy each other. I hear the same music regardless of venue. If someone starts something new and creative in one place, it spreads to all the other stadiums. I call this, "Whoomp! There it is!" syndromeComment
Comment