I don't know,since USC doesn't have a tough schedule if LSU,the Sooners and USC all go undefeated,I think it'll be LSU and the Sooners
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Appalachian St. Beats Michigan...
Collapse
X
-
"Time to nut up or shut up"
-Tallahassee
http://ultimatewarriorcollection.webs.com/
My stuff on facebook Incompatible Browser | Facebook -
Man, that sounds familiar, like the 2003 season. LSU beats the Sooners for the BCS NC and AP gives USC some votes to divide the NC again.sigpicComment
-
"Time to nut up or shut up"
-Tallahassee
http://ultimatewarriorcollection.webs.com/
My stuff on facebook Incompatible Browser | FacebookComment
-
What was screwed up about that year was the system generated points and the two teams with the lowest points (I believe) made it to the NC game. USC was third in the point system and all Div 1-A schools agreed on this system, no matter whether if it was completely right or wrong. Any two of these three teams could have gone to the NC game, but the system picked LSU and OU. The system didn't take into consideration whether the team won their conference, which OU did not do and LSU and USC did. It only looked at strength of schedule, wins, etc. LSU and OU played and beat better teams than USC did in the regular system. I do agree USC should have been there because they won their Conference title.
Well, LSU beats OU in the BCS NC game, takes home the crystal football, and USC wins in the Rose Bowl, and the AP (PAC-10 slanted) gives USC votes for the NC, even though USC wasn't even supposed to be in the running for the votes.
Well, thats in the past, so all we can hope for now is an LSU /USC match up in New Orleans in January.sigpicComment



won it all
Comment