Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Harry Potter wants to be Robin...
Collapse
X
-
-
He could be Dr Sivana with some old age make-up or Sivana's kid, or maybe Bookworm if Warner wanted to adapt the character from the 66 show. He's like 5-4 and he's not built like Stalone or Cruise. Dick Grayson's not tall as an adult, but he is average height.
With Affleck being a full foot taller, it would be trouble to have them in a medium shot together.
Randy Newman and I say, No, lol.Last edited by madmarva; Jun 22, '14, 7:34 AM.Comment
-
Umm, Radcliffe notwithstanding, who wants to look like Stallone ('roided out) or Cruise (50 and trying so hard to look 30, he's starting to resemble papier-mache).
DR's about as appropriate as Cavill or Momoa.Last edited by PNGwynne; Jun 22, '14, 10:58 AM.WANTED: Dick Grayson SI trousers; gray AJ Mustang horse; vintage RC Batman (Bruce Wayne) head; minty Wolfman tights; mint Black Knight sword; minty Launcelot boots; Lion Rock (pale) Dracula & Mummy heads; Lion Rock Franky squared boots; Wayne Foundation blue furniture; Flash Gordon/Ming (10") unbroken holsters; CHiPs gloved arms; POTA T2 tan body; CTVT/vintage Friar Tuck robes, BBP TZ Burgess Meredith glasses.Comment
-
See, here is where everyone's personal perception varies. I thought Cavill was excellent as Superman. By far the best since Reeve, and actually he was better proportioned physically than Reeve, who always looked gangly to me even after he put on some muscle. Superman has always been drawn thick, at least until until the New52. Now, Reeve's performance made up for anything he lacked in the role.
As far as Radcliffe, I just can't see a 5-4, adult super hero unless it was Al Pratt the original Atom or Wolverine, and the way Wolverine is drawn, he would be roided out like Stallone.
I will say this, Radcliffe is a good actor and would likely give a good performance, depending on the script. I just don't see his stature as super hero-like. Yeah, he's the right size for a 14-year-old Robin, but he's probably a decade past the part.
My mention of Cruise and Stallone had to do with their stature. Both are 5-9, which is small for someone who is going to attempt to impose their will on others in a physical nature, and Radcliffe's not even that tall.
And, yeah, I know Hollywood has had late 20 and even 30-year-olds playing teens for years.
I really think Radcliffe was joking anyway, and for the most part I was to.Last edited by madmarva; Jun 22, '14, 2:30 PM.Comment
-
Ach, I was just being snarky & discontented. I think Cruise is 5'6" though & always wears lifts.WANTED: Dick Grayson SI trousers; gray AJ Mustang horse; vintage RC Batman (Bruce Wayne) head; minty Wolfman tights; mint Black Knight sword; minty Launcelot boots; Lion Rock (pale) Dracula & Mummy heads; Lion Rock Franky squared boots; Wayne Foundation blue furniture; Flash Gordon/Ming (10") unbroken holsters; CHiPs gloved arms; POTA T2 tan body; CTVT/vintage Friar Tuck robes, BBP TZ Burgess Meredith glasses.Comment
-
Just let him borrow Cruise's box.You must try to generate happiness within yourself. If you aren't happy in one place, chances are you won't be happy anyplace. -Ernie BanksComment
-
^^ Whatever happened with that? Did DC settle with them or was there never a lawsuit?You must try to generate happiness within yourself. If you aren't happy in one place, chances are you won't be happy anyplace. -Ernie BanksComment
-
I don't think there was a lawsuit. Warner made more money off the Harry Potter films than they'll ever make off Timothy Hunter.
Who knows, it might have helped Warner secure the movie rights?
I remember reading that Gaiman graciously blew it off to coincidence and expressed his admiration for Rowlings' work.Last edited by madmarva; Jun 23, '14, 8:43 AM.Comment
-
I think he'd do okay.
I think he kind of looks like Burt ward a bit.
Knowing Hollywood though I'm sure they go with say I don't know momoa maybe or the rock...lol“When you say “It’s hard”, it actually means “I’m not strong enough to fight for it”. Stop saying its hard. Think positive!”Comment
-
-
Its a mighty big coinkidink.
I don't think there was a lawsuit. Warner made more money off the Harry Potter films than they'll ever make off Timothy Hunter.
Who knows, it might have helped Warner secure the movie rights?
I remember reading that Gaiman graciously blew it off to coincidence and expressed his admiration for Rowlings' work.You must try to generate happiness within yourself. If you aren't happy in one place, chances are you won't be happy anyplace. -Ernie BanksComment
-
^Yeah, like I wrote Gaiman was being really gracious, but if the quotes and story were accurate, it came across that he really respected her work. The books are very well written, and she created a world that could be nearly as fertile as Star Wars if she chose to allow others to play with her creations. Gaiman and Warners probably figured it wasn't worth the fight. I'm not sure if Gaiman has any ownership rights to the character. Likely not. He hadn't become noted novelist Neil Gaiman at the point of Hunter's creation so it may be DC's character outright.
A Tim Hunter/Shazam team-up could be fun if the right creators were involved.Comment
Comment