Actually, No. you have to understand what Siegal and Shuster were influenced by back when they were boys. back in those days circus strongmen were very popular. If you ever looked at pics from the time, many of them wore tights and trunks. Superman is in his purest form is a circus strongman with a cape added which many of them wore.
I don't think two kids from the 30's were thinking let's put red trunks to break up the blue.....
I don't think two kids from the 30's were thinking let's put red trunks to break up the blue.....


And even worse, he followed the same tired story of Lex and real estate. It was a complete mess. The audience was as confused as Singer was. And then to add a kid to that slop? The death knell. For any good ideas introduced in that film, they were quickly buried under an uneven script and a overly conceptualized hero and his past. Does it look like the Man of Steel is taking notes from this debacle? So far I would have to say no. Singer tweaked the costume and audiences revolted. This here is a full on overhaul. I don't see audiences embracing more change. And if anything, this might remind them more of their bad experience with 'Returns'.


Comment