Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
New Spider-Man
Collapse
X
-
You've never seen the anquish I've felt being told I couldn't play "Luke Cage" because I wasn't Black.
Or Spock because I'm not Vulcan.
Or Galen because I wasn't a Simian.
Or Kato because I wasn't Oriental.
"Oh, the pain...."Last edited by david_b; Aug 4, '11, 8:47 AM.Peace.. Through Superior Firepower.
Comment
-
>Everyone in this thread disagrees with you
Not everyone. Seriously! What’s a guy gotta do to get a little hate around here?!?!
>Why treat him differently than Peter Parker?
I gotta say that this is where my contention with the issue comes in. I don’t think Spidey’s ethnicity is important at all for the character; black, white, hispanic, asian, inuit.... it wouldn’t alter the core story or themes at all. So I see no controversy in the decision. What worries me is that by changing the guy in the mask, it gives them free reign to rerun the old tropes and claim them as new. (Just like why Lois and Clark breaking up bothered me.) But I reconciled myself to that sort of thing 20 years ago, when I noticed the subplots have been going around and around for way longer than I’d been alive. (‘Course, that’s also when I pretty much stopped reading superhero books. Coincidence?)
>Because Peter Parker IS SPIDERMAN!
Not in the Ultimates universe.
Don C.Comment
-
>I gotta say that this is where my contention with the issue comes in. I don’t think Spidey’s ethnicity is important at all for the character; black, white, hispanic, asian, inuit.... it wouldn’t alter the core story or themes at all. So I see no controversy in the decision. What worries me is that by changing the guy in the mask, it gives them free reign to rerun the old tropes and claim them as new. (Just like why Lois and Clark breaking up bothered me.) But I reconciled myself to that sort of thing 20 years ago, when I noticed the subplots have been going around and around for way longer than I’d been alive. (‘Course, that’s also when I pretty much stopped reading superhero books. Coincidence?) Don C.
GREAT POINT, which I agree wholeheartedly. If the ethnicity doesn't matter, then... why change it..?
Apparently it does matter to some, I suspect MORE for selling comics than for any meaningful 'relevance', anyone believing different is FOOLING THEMSELVES.
This is a business, please remember.Peace.. Through Superior Firepower.
Comment
-
Well, the US is a multi cultural society with a great deal of diversity. As for my own country, it's the only one in the world with Multi-culturalism written into the constitution. Nothing wrong with Spiderman attempting to reflect that diversity. IIf they are cranking out more and more Spiderman titles anyway, why not take a chance with one?
In the larger sphere of Spidey books, you are right that it's just one more. But diversity and multi-culti are not synonymous.
If Ultimate Spidey and 2099 are no different, than why wasn't 2099's "cultural diversity" exploited for PR the way it is with Ultimate? What does that say about Marvel's intentions, today? It goes to my earlier point. Quesada and company are into social advocacy, and the readers know it.Comment
-
>I suspect MORE for selling comics than for any meaningful 'relevance'
It ALWAYS is. Always HAS been. Which is why it seems weird that THIS is the one that killed it for everyone. The last straw maybe? (Colbert had a good take on this last night.)
I can see them thinking not of “PC” diversity, but of the “y’know.... it’s SUPPOSED to be New York, but a surprising number of folks there are white....” It doesn’t ring true, if the Marvel world is supposed to mirror ours. And hey, if you think along those lines, why not Spidey?
>than why wasn't 2099's "cultural diversity" exploited for PR the way it is with Ultimate?
Back in the 90's I don’t think ethnicity was as prominent an issue as it has been the last few years. For example: despite the ENDLESS press, I don’t remember Steel being a black dude getting that much attention.(People didn’t flinch at the slightest whiff of “PC” either. Maybe ‘cos it hadn’t been invented yet?)
It also seems that there was more acceptance from the fans for change then too. The “GRRR! New books SUCK!” thing came later. (Shortly after the “Death of Superman,” co-inkey-dinkelley enough....)
Don C.Comment
-
Y’know.... you do have some good points, but again; this isn’t new. Think of the uber-whiney 80's X-Men, and how heavy handed they played social issues. (Or the 80's Titans, or “The Dark Knight Returns,” or the Punisher, or.... well.... durned near ANY 80's superhero....) Like I said earlier, what I can’t quite grasp is why it’s a problem for people NOW.Don C.
As for NOW, it's what I wrote above. Marvel's motivations are not based in some creative need, but a mix of social advocacy dressed in opportunism. 2099 was a creative decision, Ultimates is based in a cause.
Did I miss the Ultimates issue where Aunt May or Sue Storm talked about Peter or Reed's Aspergers? Of course not. Why? Because Bendis doesn't feel any white guilt over that.Comment
-
However, you do claim to have the adult ability to relate/empathize to those circumstances even if you have not been in them yourself.
So can you put yourself in the position of someone whom this has happened to, and see why that person would think that this was potentially a positive thing? WWPPD?
I'll ignore what's obviously ignorant, condescending and insulting.
You've never seen the anquish I've felt being told I couldn't play "Luke Cage" because I wasn't Black.
Or Spock because I'm not Vulcan.
Or Galen because I wasn't a Simian.
Or Kato because I wasn't Oriental.
"Oh, the pain...."Last edited by samurainoir; Aug 4, '11, 12:49 PM.Comment
-
You owe it to Peter to at least attend his funeral.
But seriously, I think you'd really enjoy the Aunt May scenes, and Kitty, Bobby, and Johnny get their moment as well. They are genuinely moving character driven scenes, completely consistent with the characters from the past 100+ issues that you've enjoyed.Comment
-
However, you do claim to have the adult ability to relate/empathize to those circumstances even if you have not been in them yourself.
So can you put yourself in the position of someone whom this has happened to, and see why that person would think that this was potentially a positive thing?Comment
-
Hector, et tu PC..? Wow..
Actually I just confirmed you are correct ~ Apologies.
I've been called things I'm not 'keen' on, and it's NOT the point here at all, but I'll be the first to apologize here.
(...Also to any Vulcans I may have offended...)
Live Long, dudes.Last edited by david_b; Aug 4, '11, 3:37 PM.Peace.. Through Superior Firepower.
Comment
-
As for 2099 and Spider-Girl, it's called trademarks. Do you remember in the 90's when Marvel did that alternate X-reality which replaced the normal titles? That was all trademark driven. 2099 was supposed to be Ultimates before Ultimates. This tactic has been apart of the comic world since the golden age.You must try to generate happiness within yourself. If you aren't happy in one place, chances are you won't be happy anyplace. -Ernie BanksComment
-
I'd at least highly recommend the first three issues of Ultimate Fallout.
You owe it to Peter to at least attend his funeral.
But seriously, I think you'd really enjoy the Aunt May scenes, and Kitty, Bobby, and Johnny get their moment as well. They are genuinely moving character driven scenes, completely consistent with the characters from the past 100+ issues that you've enjoyed.sigpicComment
Comment