I was re-reading the Superman/Batman Supergirl book in preparation for the DVD this month and realized how different his style was from his peers. It also made me wonder how comics history will remember him. Will he be seen as an over-stylish, over-hyped artist who got a lucky break from Silvestri? Or will he be be known as a non-traditional comic artist who broke into the industry with boldness and enthusiasm carving out his own path?
I tend to think of him as a graphic designer who ended up drawing superheroes and hot chicks. I really, really like his stylized versions of the DCU. He brought a fresh perspective to decades old characters and sold a ton of books for DC simply because he did the cover. I was never a fan of Witcchblade, but I could appreciate his work on that title. Few artists could match him for small details like armor and I doubt anyone could match him for architectural design.
He may not go down as legendary, but he did his own thing and never changed or backed off, much like his health battle. I see him as brave on both fronts.
Scott
I tend to think of him as a graphic designer who ended up drawing superheroes and hot chicks. I really, really like his stylized versions of the DCU. He brought a fresh perspective to decades old characters and sold a ton of books for DC simply because he did the cover. I was never a fan of Witcchblade, but I could appreciate his work on that title. Few artists could match him for small details like armor and I doubt anyone could match him for architectural design.
He may not go down as legendary, but he did his own thing and never changed or backed off, much like his health battle. I see him as brave on both fronts.
Scott
Comment