Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
New look for Wonder Woman
Collapse
X
-
-
You are a bold and courageous person, afraid of nothing. High on a hill top near your home, there stands a dilapidated old mansion. Some say the place is haunted, but you don't believe in such myths. One dark and stormy night, a light appears in the topmost window in the tower of the old house. You decide to investigate... and you never return...Comment
-
Good point. I didn't even think about that. Maybe she'll just go back to being an adopted Amazon, instead of all that goofiness about her being drug around by the Dark Angel through different lives. Or were the John Byrne years retconned out and I missed it?Hey! Where's the waiter with the water for my daughter?
Check out my customs!
https://www.facebook.com/BizarroAmy
http://www.tumblr.com/blog/bizarroamyComment
-
-
The way I read it, the Amazons are going bye-bye for now....so it seems like WG/DT is out in the cold....again.Think OUTSIDE the Box! For the BEST in Repro & Custom Packaging!Comment
-
This may answer a lot of everyone's questions....
J. Michael Straczynski: She doesn't really remember any of it, because in this timeline, it never happened, so there's nothing to remember. However, she does keep getting brief flashes of images that we will recognize as being from the Wonder Woman timeline that we know.
In a way, the person she's become is searching for the person she was ... and maybe she'll find that person, maybe she won't, and maybe they'll meet somewhere in-between.
As it stands now, Diana was taken from Paradise Island 18 years ago, when she was a child. The island was under a massive assault, and Hippolyta wanted to be sure that her daughter survived. The queen led the final defense of Paradise Island, but in the end was defeated. She and most of the other Amazons were killed, with some taken prisoner while the rest escaped to the four winds.
So Diana's task now is to a) find out where, how and why the timeline was changed, b) who did it, c) if it can be undone, and d) stay ahead of the forces trying to kill her while e) helping as many of the surviving Amazons stay alive as possible, since they too are still being hunted.
Straczynski: She is still Diana. She was raised in New York by other Amazons and guardians who escaped the destruction of Paradise Island, so she has a foot in both worlds. (There's this kind of cool underground location where some of her guardians have been posted for decades, and it's a very shadowy, candle-lit place...so you can go from the urban environment to something far more mythic looking in a second.)
She knows her background, having been told about it over the years, but remembers very little of it herself. She knows that they're all relying on her to put it all back the way it was, that one day the Princess will return to restore Paradise Island to its former greatness, and that's a huge responsibility for her. Sometimes she chafes against it.
Also, by virtue of being raised off the Island, and other factors involving the timeline shift, she doesn't have her full range of powers. She's nearly but not entirely invulnerable, can't fly (yet), and the lasso was taken from her mother after her death defending Paradise Island. So one by one, she has to pick up these skills or powers, allowing us to examine them more closely, and give them proper weight, rather than taking them for granted.
Someone like Superman would only know of her in the current timeline, whereas others with a more supernatural origin — Deadman, Phantom Stranger — might be able to perceive what was and what is at the same time, and could be very helpful. (Yes, you may assume that this is going to happen at some point.)
I'd rather let the Donna Troy folks speak for themselves, rather than my trying to characterize their approach. Just seems polite to do so
BAH!Think OUTSIDE the Box! For the BEST in Repro & Custom Packaging!Comment
-
In a story on Newsarama, it says there is a timeline change. Diana has flash memories of the old time line.
Instead of being raised on Paradise Island and being a hero who helped formed the JLA, this 18-year-old Wonder Woman is raised by guardians in New York. Sounds an awful lot like Donna Troy's origin.
Honestly, why not just retire Diana and come up with a new Wonder Woman or just a new character in general.
I understand some of DC's desire to strip the overtly U.S. patriotism from the character to make it more marketable worldwide. I understand the perceived and possibly necessary move to dress the character in more than just a swimsuit. I'm pretty sure the costume had a lot to do with why Warner couldn't get a worthy actress to commit to a script.
But honestly what I fins most appealing about Wonder Woman was that even though she was raised in a Grecian culture, she recognized the nobility of the U.S.'s ideals of freedom, liberty and equality and basically decided to drape herself in the U.S. flag. I know the origin changed over the years, but that's basically the original idea behind the character.
Some would say the American trappings to her origin ties her to a period of time long past — WWII — and, yes, certainly the character's roots are grounded in the 1940s. But, at least to me, American ideals aren't rooted in just one decade. American ideals come from governmental philosophy formulated more than two centuries ago, but to me, those ideals are as worthy today as they have ever been.
Now, has the U.S. always or ever totally lived up to those ideals? No, of course not. Not in 1776, 1860, 1941, 1961, 2001 or in 2010. But that does not make those ideals invalid or lame or old-fashioned or any less worthy today than when our forefathers pledged their lives, liberty and sacred honor to split from England and form our nation.
I've always seen characters like Superman, Wonder Woman and Captain America as icons to remind us of those ideals, to remind us that we can be better than we are and that even when we fail to live up to those ideals, that we still aspire to them. Most ideals can never be reached, but if they are forgotten, they can never even be aspired to.
To me what those characters stand for is what lifts them above or makes them culturally more significant than others.
Cutting Wonder Woman off from her origin devalues what has been and is special about the character. Instead of being the icon for all super heroines, she becomes just another character. The new origin as explained in news article sounds a lot like Donna Troy's.
Certainly, I can understand DC's move with the character. Don't tie her too closely to the U.S. because it would hurt the marketability of the brand across the world. Good business move? Maybe.
Is a brand still a brand when you change what made it a brand in the first place?
Coca-Cola tried to change what made it "the real thing" back in the 1980s and the public balked.
From the way JMS explained the plot, he and/or DC editorial has built a way to backdoor out of the changes for some time in the future if they don't prove popular.
I'm not a stickler for continuity. To me continuity should work for the characters not the opposite. I primarily want good stories.
But it seems with Wonder Woman 600, Wonder Woman won't be Wonder Woman anymore. That change just saved me 5 bucks.Comment
-
I don't care what anybody says, that is NOT Wonder Woman!!"Do you believe, you believe in magic?
'Cos I believe, I believe that I do,
Yes, I can see I believe that it's magic
If your mission is magic your love will shine true."Comment
-
I understand the perceived and possibly necessary move to dress the character in more than just a swimsuit.
But it seems with Wonder Woman 600, Wonder Woman won't be Wonder Woman anymore. That change just saved me 5 bucks.You are a bold and courageous person, afraid of nothing. High on a hill top near your home, there stands a dilapidated old mansion. Some say the place is haunted, but you don't believe in such myths. One dark and stormy night, a light appears in the topmost window in the tower of the old house. You decide to investigate... and you never return...Comment
-
Diana with no Paradise Island, Superman walking the country...Time to break out the back issues.It's all good!Comment
-
THIs never happens, but I'm at a loss for words at how stupid this is. It just seems inconceivable that anyone at DC who actually still cares about the industry and it's heritage can be okay with an idea this lame. This really brings home how many stupid changes I've been witness to over the years as a comic geek. Most of the changes are fairly recent.
Superman was killed and "ressurected" as four separate losers
Batman is dead/lost in time with Grayson taking the role for now
Steve Rogers is running around in a Shield jumpsuit instead of wielding a shield!
Aquaman became a hook-handed and then water-handed assbag and was then replaced with a lookalike ******bag with the same name and was then killed in an issue nobody remembers because it was one tiny panel and it was ambiguous at best
THe cool Cockrum X-Men designs were trashed in favor of leather duds
Lex Luthor was a mad scientist and then a billionaire egomaniacal criminal and then a combination of both
Hal Jordan was turned into a mass murderer
That's all I can think of at the moment.
The only image you really need to sum up the DCU and it's representatives, the big three is the cover of the Infinite Crisis TPB. Guess who's front and center? I was never going to pick up the WW book anyway, but this debacle is indicative of the need for editorial change.
Total absurdity.
ScottI almost had a psychic girlfriend but she dumped me before we met.
If anyone here believes in psychokinesis, please raise my hand.Comment
-
Comment
-
I always liked when they borderline portray WW as a savage Amazon warrior... and if you're "that" it's perfectly reasonable to have a skimpy little suit to fight in... heck she could be nekkid...in theory.
"Street clothes" ....hey that seems like a baaaaaad idea."No. No no no no no no. You done got me talkin' politics. I didn't wanna'. Like I said y'all, I'm just happy to be alive. I think I'll scoot over here right by this winda', let this beautiful carriage rock me to sleep, and dream about how lucky I am." - Chris MannixComment
Comment