Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
New Batman 1966 pictures up on FTC's FB page
Collapse
X
-
^I think someone on the board doctored the original photos with PhotoshopLeave a comment:
-
Aren't the pics on the right the corrected rotocast heads? Those turned out fantastic. I think it was the protos that had the lipstick. I was hesitant about these till I saw those a few moments ago. That is buy or die stuff right there.Leave a comment:
-
You're not 'fixing' them. You're making alterations that suit your personal tastes. To many collectors they are just fine as is.Leave a comment:
-
I'm still pinching myself about getting 66 Batman megos. Can't wait and these FAR exceed my expectations. No complaints from this bear.Leave a comment:
-
But dammit, we shouldn't HAVE to fix figures that cost over $25 a piece!
Sorry, that's my major grumble with many of these figure lines.
ChrisLeave a comment:
-
The change in the eyes is better for sure, but it's the lip color change that really makes a difference. And that's an easy fix. Thanks for the pictures.Leave a comment:
-
All grouped together for easy comparison:
FTC_BatTVRiddlerCU2.jpg
FTC_BatTVRobinCU_Revised 1.jpg
FTC_BatTVBatmanCU.jpgLeave a comment:
-
-
Alright I'm starting to feel riddler now.He just kind of looked like an old granny before the repaint.
Blue eyes and no lipstick now that I can work with thanks for the pics to compare.Leave a comment:
-
Riddler does look better and Robin looks MUCH better with darkened mask. I think Robin looks better with his lips left alone and Batman looks just fine as is.Leave a comment:
-
I think that this proves, that a great sculpt will get blamed for a less than complimentary paint job.Leave a comment:
-


Leave a comment: