Both Halperin on his linked interview and He-man.org in their intro their draft of the Bible both said the same thing in different ways:
Michael Halperin wrote the Masters of the Universe series bible back in December of 1982. Michael was approached by someone at Mattel who had read a sword and sorcery screenplay he had written. They called Michael in, and this was his first introduction to the toys. Up until this point, Mattel's vision was limited to its two introductory figures, He-Man and Skeletor. Mattel, upon releasing the action figures, received a number of calls and letters from kids who wanted to know who these characters were, where they came from, and who were the bad guys and who were the good guys. Mattel requested that Michael Halperin write the origins of He-Man and the Masters of the Universe as a bible for the television show and for merchandising purposes. Up to that point, all that existed were the toys.
Mr. Halperin basically took two toys, a couple of storylines introduced in mini-comic books, and produced an entire universe out of them.
This bible was given to the freelance and staff writers for the He-Man and the Masters of the Universe series at Filmation Animation Studios in 1983.
Mr. Halperin basically took two toys, a couple of storylines introduced in mini-comic books, and produced an entire universe out of them.
This bible was given to the freelance and staff writers for the He-Man and the Masters of the Universe series at Filmation Animation Studios in 1983.
I was just curious what explains the same date for both Bible drafts, along with the reported beginning of Filmation's involvement not happening until 1983 (and only with Halperin's guidance)...
...if not the explanation that: Halperin's (purely mini-comic/toy based) initial draft presented to Filmation was a 1982 draft, while the final draft you linked clearly marked with the "1982" date is only marked that way because it's the date of the initial draft's completion, a draft that Halperin then revised with Filmation during pre-production in 1983? This resulting in a 1983 revised draft ultimately displaying the initial draft's 1982 completion date?
If there's another explanation for this nagging discrepancy , I'm all for knowing it!



Leave a comment: