I kinda like the 12" hasbro figures for the price, even with the limited articulation, but one thing bothers me. Any idea why they would make them in such stiff and unnatural poses with the legs so close together and the arms so close to their sides? The figures would look much more heroic and natural with the feet spread further apart and arms out away from the body slightly, and this would not add more pieces to mold or increase price in any way, unless the increased packaging size and shipping are the reason.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Hasbro 12" titan series
Collapse
X
-
I kinda like the 12" hasbro figures for the price, even with the limited articulation, but one thing bothers me. Any idea why they would make them in such stiff and unnatural poses with the legs so close together and the arms so close to their sides? The figures would look much more heroic and natural with the feet spread further apart and arms out away from the body slightly, and this would not add more pieces to mold or increase price in any way, unless the increased packaging size and shipping are the reason. -
-
I can see why these have been a huge hit though. A big 12 inch figure for $10.00 versus a tiny one that is usually much more is eye catching to a kid. My Grandson has all of the DC characters except Green Arrow. They're durable and keep him entertained. Much better than the usual cost of getting him a toy, so I'm always happy to see new characters.Comment
-
Add to that that there are multiple toys being compared/contrasted here...and...well, there ya have it.
I knoiw for me personally, discussing forum etiquette issues beats out searching "Hasbro"" "Titan" "Mattel" "12 inch" any day"No. No no no no no no. You done got me talkin' politics. I didn't wanna'. Like I said y'all, I'm just happy to be alive. I think I'll scoot over here right by this winda', let this beautiful carriage rock me to sleep, and dream about how lucky I am." - Chris MannixComment
-
-
^LOL
Anyway...regarding the posting (or lack thereof) of photos...
No one is or should be made to feel obligated to provide photos for a discussion. We're all busy. We all do what we can, when we can, as a courtesy but it shouldn't be expected. Posting photos here involves more than a bit of work. Either looking the pics up or taking them yourself, saving them on your computer, then uploading them to photobucket, etc...and sometimes it's just not convenient, or maybe you just flat out don't feel like it after a long day at work.
Bottom line...if they aren't here and you want to see 'em that bad...go look 'em up yourself.Comment
-
Seriously, man. To think I follow Anyone is wacky. Truth is---if you're outspoken with opinion----it's just odds are we'll run into each other more often.
---regarding this particular "debate"----I get it that some people don't want an obligation to post pics or links----but, really, how else can the thread reach the potential of it's title?
So---fine---don't post pics----don't put a link----but, I think it's poor sport to "shame" anyone that's asking for those things, things in the thread's best interest
Me D? "Shame" me all ya want---I give you carte blancheLast edited by huedell; Aug 12, '15, 5:13 AM."No. No no no no no no. You done got me talkin' politics. I didn't wanna'. Like I said y'all, I'm just happy to be alive. I think I'll scoot over here right by this winda', let this beautiful carriage rock me to sleep, and dream about how lucky I am." - Chris MannixComment
Comment