Help support the Mego Museum
Help support the Mego Museum

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Misremembering VHS or VHS didn't look nearly as bad as people now claim it did

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Werewolf
    replied
    I have one the last models of VCR/DVD combos made before the production of VCRs were stopped. It actually has HDMI output. VHS image quality through HDMI on an HDTV is soft as you would expect a standard definition format would look on an HDTV. But it also looks far better than you would expect and is perfectly watchable.

    Leave a comment:


  • Iron Mego
    replied
    Just making a personal annotation, it's not directed at the context of your post.

    Leave a comment:


  • Werewolf
    replied
    Originally posted by Iron Mego
    I cannot and will not jump on the VHS nostalgia bandwagon though.
    This is actually about remembering the format in its correct historical context and not comically exaggerating its limitations. VHS picture quality obviously doesn't compare to Blu-Ray on a modern HDTV. But a good quality VHS tape on nice picture tube TV looked perfectly fine for the time.

    Leave a comment:


  • Iron Mego
    replied
    My problem with VHS, and why I started buying laser discs then DVDs and then Blu-Ray, is more about aspect ratio than quality. Once I discovered that movies were shown, for the most part, in the wrong aspect ratio and were either presented pan and scan or "formatted to fit your TV"--which they still do unfortunately--it drove me crazy. Then of course you get into the open-matte problem, one notable example is Pee-Wee's Big Adventure when you can see the bike chain coming up through the bottom of his bag, which shows MORE of a movie than the director intended. That's when you see stuff like boom mics and tracks.
    I cannot and will not jump on the VHS nostalgia bandwagon though. Movies in HD in the correct aspect ratio just make me happy. I remember watching Eraserhead on VHS and not being able to see half of the movie. When I finally saw it on the big screen (and now on my remastered DVD) it was a revelation. I found myself muttering, "Oh, that's what that was!" It's probably not the best example since the movie is really dark anyway, but man what a huge difference!

    Leave a comment:


  • palitoy
    replied
    Yeah, I think a lot of folks forget that TV's have improved a lot as well but a nice new SP pre record of a movie on a tube TV was pretty sweet.

    I blame stuff like "Tim and Eric" which sort of lampoons the VHS tape that's been recorded on 50 times for this perception now.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bruce Banner
    replied
    Our earliest top-loading VCRs had a really good picture quality.
    Both Betamax and VHS.

    Leave a comment:


  • Brown Bear
    replied
    I was in no hurry to jump on the DVD bandwagon and leave my vhs collection behind. Eventually I had no choice but still love my vhs (and beta) tapes.

    Leave a comment:


  • Misremembering VHS or VHS didn't look nearly as bad as people now claim it did

    VHS is obviously way below HD formats like Blu-Ray. No argument there. But it wasn't nearly as bad as it's now often portrayed as.

Working...
😀
🥰
🤢
😎
😡
👍
👎