Help support the Mego Museum
Help support the Mego Museum

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Mego Superhero Prototypes discovered (and for sale!)

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • monitor_ep
    Talkative Member
    • May 11, 2013
    • 8839

    #61
    Sorry guys the lot with the Shazam Family went for $2,270

    Robin set went for $5,975

    Superman/Aquaman went for $3,107
    Last edited by monitor_ep; Jun 12, '16, 10:45 PM.
    Visit my wiki site:

    Comic Books in the Media

    To view my custom works of both JLU and Megos go to:

    Monitor_EP Deviantart page

    Action Jackson Road Trip log

    Comment

    • LonnieFisher
      Eloquent Member
      • Jan 19, 2008
      • 11015

      #62
      Holy crap!

      Comment

      • darkmonkeygod
        Career Member
        • Sep 5, 2005
        • 850

        #63
        Originally posted by monitor_ep
        Sorry guys the lot with the Shazam Family went for $2,270

        Robin set went for $5,975

        Superman/Aquaman went for $3,107
        Less than I expected, tbh.

        Comment

        • Marvelmania
          A Ray of Sunshine
          • Jun 17, 2001
          • 10392

          #64
          ^^^ That's what I was thinking.

          Comment

          • SWBL5252
            Museum Patron
            • Jun 12, 2012
            • 137

            #65
            Wonder if the individual pieces will end up on eBay?

            Comment

            • imp
              Mego Book Author
              • Apr 20, 2003
              • 1579

              #66
              Originally posted by hedrap
              Lou Schemier and Norm Prescott were the exec producers of live-action Shazam! and the founders of Filmation in '62. It's their names rotating in a circle at end credits of their 70's productions as a way to say equal credit is due.

              According to Schemier...

              Filmation had lost their original DC rights to Hanna-Barbera for Superfriends, which premiered Sept '73. They opted for Captain Marvel because he was the closest to Superman. Schemier implies Captain Marvel became Shazam! becuase of Gomer Pyle.

              Captain Marvel was pitched as animated, but a CBS exec wanted live-action. CBS picked it up in March '74 and by June '74, Filmation started prepping studio space. Shazam! premiered in Sept '74.


              1973
              February - DC publishes Shazam!
              Oct-Dec - WGSH Wave 2 is released

              Sept 1973 - January 1974: Superfriends premieres. At some point, Filmation options Shazam! for animated and creates a test reel.

              1974
              February - WGSH Shazam! is advertised
              March - Shazam! is greenlit by CBS
              June - Filmation preps Shazam! for shooting
              August - WGSH Shazam! is released
              Sept - Shazam! premieres on CBS

              It appears DC informed Mego of animated Filmation Shazam in '73. Mego kept a Wave 2 slot open for the character and put Fawcett head sculpts, designs in the works. When it changed to live-action, Mego froze until someone was cast. Once they had promo picks of Bostwick, a resculpt was done and released solo, right before the TV premiere.

              Junior then would have been in development due to the original animated cartoon concept, which was to feature the Marvel Family. When CBS asked for live-action, Filmation stripped everything possible to meet budget costs.

              So...Superfriends creates a sales eruption. Mego tries to capitalize with TV tie-ins using Spidey and Shazam! Spidey does huge business, turning WGSH Wave 3 into Spidey/Marvel-centric. Secret Identities follows along, dropping Batson for Parker.

              Junior and other DC characters get swarmed by Spideymania. Arrow's one-off Superfriends S1 appearance, (and possibly tooling costs), gets him released. By the time Flash, Lantern, etc...were cartoon popular in '78, Mego and 8-inch were on the ropes thanks to Star Wars.
              Fascinating read, but what are your source materials for all of this information? With all due respect, you've been tossing around a lot of erroneous statements as fact in this thread, including misrepresenting me and my book. I can't tell where your "facts" end and your opinion starts. Can you please cite your reference material? Titles, links, scans, etc. I'd love to read those passages, too. Thanks.

              - Benjamin

              Comment

              • monitor_ep
                Talkative Member
                • May 11, 2013
                • 8839

                #67
                Well I bid up to $1000 on the Shazam family and it went above that. I really hope they show up on ebay. I would love to get the Captain Marvel, Captain Marvel Jr. and Alfred to turn into real megos.
                Last edited by monitor_ep; Jun 13, '16, 8:01 PM.
                Visit my wiki site:

                Comic Books in the Media

                To view my custom works of both JLU and Megos go to:

                Monitor_EP Deviantart page

                Action Jackson Road Trip log

                Comment

                • hedrap
                  Permanent Member
                  • Feb 10, 2009
                  • 4825

                  #68
                  Originally posted by imp
                  Fascinating read, but what are your source materials for all of this information? With all due respect, you've been tossing around a lot of erroneous statements as fact in this thread, including misrepresenting me and my book. I can't tell where your "facts" end and your opinion starts. Can you please cite your reference material? Titles, links, scans, etc. I'd love to read those passages, too. Thanks.

                  - Benjamin
                  After a passive-aggressive swipe like that? I'm good.

                  Comment

                  • imp
                    Mego Book Author
                    • Apr 20, 2003
                    • 1579

                    #69
                    Originally posted by hedrap
                    After a passive-aggressive swipe like that? I'm good.
                    Oh I'm sorry, was I not being clear enough? I was trying to be firm yet polite. Let me try again:

                    "I THINK YOU'RE FULL OF CRAP."

                    …Better?



                    - Benjamin

                    Comment

                    • dr_cyclops
                      One eyed, wonder
                      • Dec 17, 2009
                      • 2138

                      #70
                      Originally posted by hedrap
                      Lou Schemier and Norm Prescott were the exec producers of live-action Shazam! and the founders of Filmation in '62. It's their names rotating in a circle at end credits of their 70's productions as a way to say equal credit is due.

                      According to Schemier...

                      Filmation had lost their original DC rights to Hanna-Barbera for Superfriends, which premiered Sept '73. They opted for Captain Marvel because he was the closest to Superman. Schemier implies Captain Marvel became Shazam! becuase of Gomer Pyle.

                      Captain Marvel was pitched as animated, but a CBS exec wanted live-action. CBS picked it up in March '74 and by June '74, Filmation started prepping studio space. Shazam! premiered in Sept '74.


                      1973
                      February - DC publishes Shazam!
                      Oct-Dec - WGSH Wave 2 is released

                      Sept 1973 - January 1974: Superfriends premieres. At some point, Filmation options Shazam! for animated and creates a test reel.

                      1974
                      February - WGSH Shazam! is advertised
                      March - Shazam! is greenlit by CBS
                      June - Filmation preps Shazam! for shooting
                      August - WGSH Shazam! is released
                      Sept - Shazam! premieres on CBS

                      It appears DC informed Mego of animated Filmation Shazam in '73. Mego kept a Wave 2 slot open for the character and put Fawcett head sculpts, designs in the works. When it changed to live-action, Mego froze until someone was cast. Once they had promo picks of Bostwick, a resculpt was done and released solo, right before the TV premiere.

                      Junior then would have been in development due to the original animated cartoon concept, which was to feature the Marvel Family. When CBS asked for live-action, Filmation stripped everything possible to meet budget costs.

                      So...Superfriends creates a sales eruption. Mego tries to capitalize with TV tie-ins using Spidey and Shazam! Spidey does huge business, turning WGSH Wave 3 into Spidey/Marvel-centric. Secret Identities follows along, dropping Batson for Parker.

                      Junior and other DC characters get swarmed by Spideymania. Arrow's one-off Superfriends S1 appearance, (and possibly tooling costs), gets him released. By the time Flash, Lantern, etc...were cartoon popular in '78, Mego and 8-inch were on the ropes thanks to Star Wars.
                      My bad. I did not misquote you. I misunderstood you. I thought it was a question about an animated Shazam cartoon with the Marvel Family.

                      I have nothing to back this up except the 'What I heards':
                      When DC acquired Capt. Marvel and the Marvel Family, the contract asked that DC not use any of the titles of the original Fawcette comics to market said properties. Since Fawcette published many comics down to the character names, this left DC with few options of calling the books Anything. "Shazam" was well know to Capt. Marvel fans and about the only thing left. So now we have for marketing titles Capt. Shazam, Capt. Shazam Jr., the Shazam Family, and Mary Shazam, or maybe Shazam Girl (take your pick). So we could still have an Uncle Marvel and some Lt. Marvels. Yet at this point, we might as well call them Uncle Shazam and the Lt. Shazams. In context of story, these characters are allowed to be refered to by their character names. They just can't call a product by these names. Well that's what I heard, anyway.

                      Comment

                      • hedrap
                        Permanent Member
                        • Feb 10, 2009
                        • 4825

                        #71
                        Originally posted by dr_cyclops
                        My bad. I did not misquote you. I misunderstood you. I thought it was a question about an animated Shazam cartoon with the Marvel Family.

                        I have nothing to back this up except the 'What I heards':
                        When DC acquired Capt. Marvel and the Marvel Family, the contract asked that DC not use any of the titles of the original Fawcette comics to market said properties. Since Fawcette published many comics down to the character names, this left DC with few options of calling the books Anything. "Shazam" was well know to Capt. Marvel fans and about the only thing left. So now we have for marketing titles Capt. Shazam, Capt. Shazam Jr., the Shazam Family, and Mary Shazam, or maybe Shazam Girl (take your pick). So we could still have an Uncle Marvel and some Lt. Marvels. Yet at this point, we might as well call them Uncle Shazam and the Lt. Shazams. In context of story, these characters are allowed to be refered to by their character names. They just can't call a product by these names. Well that's what I heard, anyway.
                        No problem. You made me rethink the IP, which cleared up how live-action started with Filmation.

                        RE: Captain Marvel That makes perfect sense and ties into what Schemier said; they settled on Shazam! because of Gomer Pyle.

                        Pyle was the 2nd most-watched show four out of five years. Even when it ended, it was second. A third of all TVs, 20+ million, were watching Pyle. It wasn't canceled, Nabors had enough so he didn't renew. It ended in 1969 but as Desilu production, would go straight into syndication through today.

                        Nabors was so associated with the word Shazam!...he cut a record with that as the title track?!



                        Consider DC could have picked up Captain Marvel at any point from 1953 onward, so why wait twenty years and until after Marvel secured the copyright? If he was truly a Superman knock-off, then why risk diluting their main guy? Gomer freakin Pyle made Shazam! a relevant catchphrase from the late 60's into the syndication boom of the early 70's.

                        Comment

                        • hedrap
                          Permanent Member
                          • Feb 10, 2009
                          • 4825

                          #72
                          Originally posted by imp
                          Oh I'm sorry, was I not being clear enough? I was trying to be firm yet polite. Let me try again:

                          "I THINK YOU'RE FULL OF CRAP."

                          …Better?



                          - Benjamin

                          Oh noes. The glorious expert finally lost his kewl. He could see that coming? I know. Anyone who has been around you in some capacity.

                          I'm not answering your questions, because I don't need your seal of approval. You were irrelevant to me a long, long time ago. And I didn't "misrepresent" you or your book...which I bought off Ebay, from Overstock, for 20 shipped, by the way. They had like fifty copies.

                          I do like the irony of how Palitoy was really happy to see a thread like this after the crapfest he's been through. Then you come along and **** all over it. That takes talent.

                          Comment

                          • ODBJBG
                            Permanent Member
                            • May 15, 2009
                            • 3209

                            #73
                            Head still looks like Superman to me and very little like Cap Jr. I wonder if it wasn't an attempt at doing a Reeve Superman? I can't recall if we got concrete dates on when these sculpts were made.

                            As for Shazam stuff, I don't really buy into the whole Gomer Pyle story. Shazam was chosen because it was the only thing that makes sense for the character and honestly, all things considered, it makes very little sense to begin with that the guy is called Captain Marvel, when Shazam is the key to everything in the books. I think DC knew that but I'm honestly a bit surprised they didn't just see fit to change his name and correct what was, IMO, largely a Fawcett error in what they called their character. But I suppose that is a debate for another day.

                            I cast doubt on the Pyle stuff because while Schemier was a great storyteller and often fun to hear some of his versions of "how things came to be", many of those stories through the years have been conflated, misremembered and more bluntly just flat out wrong at times.

                            Comment

                            • dr_cyclops
                              One eyed, wonder
                              • Dec 17, 2009
                              • 2138

                              #74
                              More of the way I heard it; NPP sued Fawcette more than once. Fawcette won and NPP took it back to court. Capt. Marvel was out selling Superman and NPP was not happy. Fawcette continued the battle until they decided that comics were too small an interest to their book publishing. After winning a few lawsuits they decided to discontinue their comics line, and end the court battles. Year/decades later, NPP, now DC wanted to buy the rights to the characters. Shazam appear for the fist time in close to 20 years with some of the original artist doing the stories. Doesn't seem to matter, because the company that killed Capt. Marvel should not be the company to bring him back. Old fans wouldn't touch this "Shazam" property with a ten foot pole. Despite a very heartfelt attempt by DC, Shazam only does moderately well. Much better because of the live-action series. Problem is that the original fans are much older and not into TV shows and toys. While the 70s kids know him from the TV show, characters like Capt. Marvel Jr. and Mary Marvel will have to wait until the early 80s to see screen time.
                              I think it is very possible that DC Thought they were getting the rights to the Marvel Family only to find out that they couldn't call any products by the character names.

                              Comment

                              • Earth 2 Chris
                                Verbose Member
                                • Mar 7, 2004
                                • 32972

                                #75
                                I believe the reason the book as called Shazam was all due to Marvel. While the Captain and company were in limbo, Roy Thomas (of all people!) encouraged Stan Lee to create a version of Captain Marvel so the now popular company could stake their claim on that name. When DC (who drove the Caption INTO limbo) acquired the rights to the Marvel Family, Marvel Comics had a lock on comic titles using that name, hence the use of Shazam! on titles AND merchandise.

                                Chris
                                sigpic

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                😀
                                🥰
                                🤢
                                😎
                                😡
                                👍
                                👎