I've never been a fan of AFA or CGC, but if I were to sell some of my rarer comics, I'd be sure to get them graded because, sadly, you need to if you want to get big bucks these days.
The problem inherent in these grading services is that grading is a subjective process, not an objective one. It can't be objective because there are so many factors involved in a grade and everyone has their own preference for what defects are worse than others. Which do you grade higher: a white book with bent corner or a yellowed copy with no bend?
I'm not super-familiar with AFA, but I've seen a few CGC comics where I wonder how the comic ended up with the grade it got. Maybe grading was stricter in the old days, but I just recently saw a golden age book with a CGC grade of 5.0 (VG/F in old-fashioned lingo) where it looked like a mouse chewed through the book about 1/4" off the top corner. I've also seen 9.2 and 9.4 bronze age comics that looked like they were yellow. You can't take CGC's grading at face value at all.
The problem inherent in these grading services is that grading is a subjective process, not an objective one. It can't be objective because there are so many factors involved in a grade and everyone has their own preference for what defects are worse than others. Which do you grade higher: a white book with bent corner or a yellowed copy with no bend?
I'm not super-familiar with AFA, but I've seen a few CGC comics where I wonder how the comic ended up with the grade it got. Maybe grading was stricter in the old days, but I just recently saw a golden age book with a CGC grade of 5.0 (VG/F in old-fashioned lingo) where it looked like a mouse chewed through the book about 1/4" off the top corner. I've also seen 9.2 and 9.4 bronze age comics that looked like they were yellow. You can't take CGC's grading at face value at all.
Comment