Help support the Mego Museum
Help support the Mego Museum

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Question about multimillion dollar sci-fi movies

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Gorn Captain
    Invincible Ironing Man
    • Feb 28, 2008
    • 10549

    #16
    Originally posted by type1kirk
    I've always hated CGI used on spaceships

    To me, their movements are TOO soft and fluid ...
    The jerkiness of mounted model filmed with a motion control camera brings more life and feel into a moving spaceship.

    Also, CGI spaceships reflect light weirdly.
    I think the makers overdue it and always put too much shine on the ships.
    CGI ships are always in the perfect spot ... which is another thing that makes them unrealistic.
    I don't know what it is, but the texture on CG ships is often different than a physical model. They often use a certain type of grey that gives it a "painted" look. The depth of the CG model is sometimes also lacking. When it feels "painted" to me, I feel like I'm watching a cartoon.
    But we're back in the CG/no CG thread, of course....
    .
    .
    .
    "When things are at their darkest, it's a brave man that can kick back and party."

    Comment

    • mego73
      Printed paperboard Tiger
      • Aug 1, 2003
      • 6690

      #17
      The CGI done for movies is more exacting (ideally) then the stuff even done for shows in High Definition video.

      The bigger the screen, the more time you have to spend on each CGI or other visual effects shot. And time (especially in movies) is money.

      On the upside, the quality curve between high budget and lower budget CGI effects is less extreme, making more and better effects possible for lower budget productions.

      Sometimes those lower budget CGI shots are not as meticulously tweaked into looking real as the larger budget effects. And also, the best people in the industry generally are on the big budget productions with less experienced ones on the lower budget.

      Take a movie like The Journey To The Center Of The Earth remake. It was not a high budget movie. Still it had a lot of effects and they were able to show a lot more things that would've been impossible for even a high budget movie in the pre CGI days. The effects look nice, even if they often look like CGI and the movie was a lot of (silly) fun.

      [email protected]

      Comment

      • Seeker
        Neptunians RULE!
        • Feb 20, 2008
        • 1954

        #18
        An argument for those agaist CGI. Take a look at Debbie Gibsons latest...

        Mega Shark vs Giant Octopus. I heard about it on the radio and thought they were joking but sadly its true.
        Lo there do I see my Father.
        Lo there do I see my Mother and my Sisters and my Brothers.
        Lo there do I see the line of my people back to the begining.
        Lo they do call me.
        They bid me take my place among them.
        In the halls of Valhalla where the brave may live forever.

        Comment

        • ctc
          Fear the monkeybat!
          • Aug 16, 2001
          • 11183

          #19
          >Mega Shark vs Giant Octopus.

          I'm quite okay with the CGI part.... it's the "Debbie Gibson" thing that bothers me....

          Don C.

          Comment

          Working...
          😀
          🥰
          🤢
          😎
          😡
          👍
          👎