Help support the Mego Museum
Help support the Mego Museum

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The Shining vs The Shining

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Mikey
    Verbose Member
    • Aug 9, 2001
    • 47258

    The Shining vs The Shining

    Was just watching The Shining (1980 movie).

    Never realized how empty it was until I seen the 1997 TV miniseries.

    After seeing the TV miniseries when I watch the 1980 movie I feel i'm watching something that's unfinished and incomplete.
  • Hector
    el Hombre de Acero
    • May 19, 2003
    • 31852

    #2
    While it does not follow the book faithfully, I prefer the Kubrick movie...to me, the emptiness of it all is what makes it creepy to me, very atmospheric, and creepy.
    sigpic

    Comment

    • SainthoodDenied
      Veteran Member
      • Feb 26, 2008
      • 334

      #3
      I know it's blasphemy for some people to hear this but I also like the 97 remake better. I really enjoyed watching it the first time it came on t.v.
      Chad

      Comment

      • Starroid Raiders Dagon
        Persistent Member
        • Apr 28, 2013
        • 2165

        #4
        Is the 97 one the mini with the guy from the WINGS TV series? The one where he shows up as a ghost at the end (was it at a church for a wedding or something?)?? I loved the Kubrick version which led me to the book which I loved as well and the little differences. Still watch the Kubrick version when I come across it on tv. Great horror film.

        Comment

        • Nostalgiabuff
          Muddling through
          • Oct 4, 2008
          • 11423

          #5
          they both have their good moments but yeah I prefer the 97 mini too. the only thing I did not really like was the actor they cast as Danny. I both on DVD and we do watch both versions occasionally

          Comment

          • Gorn Captain
            Invincible Ironing Man
            • Feb 28, 2008
            • 10549

            #6
            I didn't like the movie because of Nicholson. You know he's crazy from the moment you see him. In the book, there's a gradual decline of his mental state, which is hard to believe with Nicholson playing the part.
            .
            .
            .
            "When things are at their darkest, it's a brave man that can kick back and party."

            Comment

            • Goblin19
              Talkative Member
              • May 2, 2002
              • 6124

              #7
              Totally agree on the way Nicholson plays it. He's already too nuts in the beginning.

              Comment

              • Starroid Raiders Dagon
                Persistent Member
                • Apr 28, 2013
                • 2165

                #8
                One of the members said this in a review of the tv mini-series, "However, seeing his films make one realize that King has quite a different opinion on the delivery of his work, as opposed to the darker opinions of his readers.", and I have felt this to be true for years. I gather that a lot of readers' minds go a lot darker when reading King' horror than how he envisions a live enactment.

                Comment

                • Mikey
                  Verbose Member
                  • Aug 9, 2001
                  • 47258

                  #9
                  The miniseries explained a lot of even tiny stuff that the movie left me scratching my head about.

                  Right down to Danny "calling" Dick Hallorann.

                  In the movie I thought Danny was just spazzing.

                  Also, it's a complete turnaround of plot to have the ghosts actually after Danny and just using Jack Torrance as a tool.

                  Knowing this everything makes a lot more sense.

                  Having the boiler blow up was a lot more dramatic too -- and again made more sense than just having Jack freeze with a funny face.

                  I also liked Rebecca De Mornay's portrayal of Wendy a lot better than Olive Oil.

                  Rebecca was way more realistic and not a stereotypical cowering dingbat.

                  Comment

                  • Nostalgiabuff
                    Muddling through
                    • Oct 4, 2008
                    • 11423

                    #10
                    plus Rebecca is smoking hot

                    Comment

                    • Mikey
                      Verbose Member
                      • Aug 9, 2001
                      • 47258

                      #11
                      Originally posted by Nostalgiabuff
                      plus Rebecca is smoking hot
                      Ohhh yes

                      She's still hot today well into her 50's

                      Comment

                      • Gorn Captain
                        Invincible Ironing Man
                        • Feb 28, 2008
                        • 10549

                        #12
                        I can no longer stomach recent Stephen King novels. They've become so depressing.
                        .
                        .
                        .
                        "When things are at their darkest, it's a brave man that can kick back and party."

                        Comment

                        • Nostalgiabuff
                          Muddling through
                          • Oct 4, 2008
                          • 11423

                          #13
                          Originally posted by Gorn Captain
                          I can no longer stomach recent Stephen King novels. They've become so depressing.
                          really? interesting. I still enjoy his novels. he has a masterful way, and always has, of making his characters very relatable and easy to become invested in. I have even been enjoying his latest trilogy of crime novels, which it looks like are moving into scifi/horror for the 3rd and final book

                          Comment

                          • Gorn Captain
                            Invincible Ironing Man
                            • Feb 28, 2008
                            • 10549

                            #14
                            Originally posted by Nostalgiabuff
                            really? interesting. I still enjoy his novels. he has a masterful way, and always has, of making his characters very relatable and easy to become invested in. I have even been enjoying his latest trilogy of crime novels, which it looks like are moving into scifi/horror for the 3rd and final book
                            I find there's a new level of darkness and gloom to them. I don't always need a happy ending, but with the later ones you just know "they're all gonna die horribly!"
                            I think I started noticing that with Tommyknockers, and it never got better. In the end, I stopped reading King.
                            I'm going to start re-reading his older books, getting my favorites in hardcover.

                            I think that King started going "dark" when his own life got harder: his eyesight deteriorating, the car accident,...
                            .
                            .
                            .
                            "When things are at their darkest, it's a brave man that can kick back and party."

                            Comment

                            • mjaycox
                              Veteran Member
                              • Jun 16, 2008
                              • 337

                              #15
                              The 97 miniseries was, like most King TV adaptations with the exception of the Tobe Hooper "'Salem's Lot", over-explained, dull, poorly acted and as scary as lukewarm spaghetti.

                              It was so damn slavishly faithful to the novel, it should have been issued with a scantron sheet so I could check off the bubbles for each scene. When King himself shows up as the ghostly bandleader in the second night, I was seriously like "fffffuuuuuuuuuuuuu*** you". While trying to make sure it hit all the points, it forgot to be scary.

                              I'll admit that Jack was too nuts from the beginning in the Kubrick version. But that is my only quibble. The movie is a fantastic series of images and set-pieces, and there is nothing in the '97 miniseries to equal the images of the:

                              -Elevator doors opening
                              -The Twins in the hallway
                              -The steadicam shots through the hedgemaze.
                              -The initial approach to the hotel over the credits
                              -Redrum in the mirror

                              Nor is there any scene of tension in the '97 series that approaches the suspense of:

                              -The assault on the family in the bathroom
                              - The ball rolling down the hallway to Danny
                              - Jack's pursuit of Wendy up the stairs

                              Last, there is nothing in the '97 series tha even comes close the replicating the brilliance of this scene:



                              Matt
                              Warm up?! We may as well sit around this cigarette!

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              😀
                              🥰
                              🤢
                              😎
                              😡
                              👍
                              👎