Ant----believe me, I "somewhat" see your point and that's why I gave the
disclaimer "so I can't properly comment on this"
because I'm TOO honest and frank for my own good
I know enough to post what I posted
Then a guy like you comes along, and uses it against
me and calls me "stupid and rude" on top of it
I don't think there's anything stupid or "sole faith" oriented about
sticking by the fact that "money talks----everywhere"
If you want to totally discount me-----fine, but you and some others around
here throw around labels like "idiot" and "stupid" without thought of civility
and letting someone have their opinion
You (and others) let opinions T you off---and then you decide the gloves are off---sorry, if I say "bite me" to that
Yeah, I might've discounted Thomas' opinion to an extent, but I didn't
name call---I'd never call him an idiot for having his view---or for
delivering his facts (which in the case of defining a law system will ALWAYS be vague at best)
You however, do the name calling constantly
disclaimer "so I can't properly comment on this"
because I'm TOO honest and frank for my own good
I know enough to post what I posted
Then a guy like you comes along, and uses it against
me and calls me "stupid and rude" on top of it
I don't think there's anything stupid or "sole faith" oriented about
sticking by the fact that "money talks----everywhere"
If you want to totally discount me-----fine, but you and some others around
here throw around labels like "idiot" and "stupid" without thought of civility
and letting someone have their opinion
You (and others) let opinions T you off---and then you decide the gloves are off---sorry, if I say "bite me" to that
Yeah, I might've discounted Thomas' opinion to an extent, but I didn't
name call---I'd never call him an idiot for having his view---or for
delivering his facts (which in the case of defining a law system will ALWAYS be vague at best)
You however, do the name calling constantly
Comment