Recent threads here on Greatest Bands/Greatest songs etc. have made me wonder about the Music Geeks here on the Museum. I am a MUSIC GEEK!!! There, I said it and I'm proud of it. I went to Five Towns College for Audio Engineering and Music Business. Unfortunately and fortunately I never ended up in the industry...but I've had a fascination with music since I was about 12 years old. The Engineering work that I did while I was in college made me have an even more appreciation for different aspects of music...especially the production side. It also helped me appreciate the other genres of music...especially Jazz and classical music.
Anyway, the reason why I started this thread is to see if there are others out there that realise that CD's and Digital music isn't as GREAT as they are made out to be. I'll give an example:
Recently bought an ION turntable (I wished these would have been out BEFORE I started replacing my vinyl on CD...would have cut my spending by at least half if not 3/4...I have probably more than 1000 CD's in my music library) and tonight I decided to pull out my vinyl copy of The Firm (Jimmy Page and Paul Rodgers) and test my ear to see if what I was hearing was in fact what I was hearing. Now I know that the music industry makes money over and over again by re-mastering CD's...but something wasn't sitting right with me. I put the copy of The Firm vinyl on the turntable and I feed it into the computer. Clean up the small static that I hear and that's it...no EQ and NO COMPRESSION, which is what the program suggests. I then proceed to burn CD of what I just took off of the vinyl/album. I bring the CD upstairs to a better stereo system and put the original CD that I have of The Firm...sounds blah with no "Punch" to it. I then put in the CD that I just burned from vinyl, the one with no EQ and NO COMPRESSION, and all I have to say is WOW!!!! My vinyl sounds better than my original CD did. And all of this was played on just a average sound system. I had a feeling that was true...but really haven't tested the theory until now.
Anyone else out there a Music GEEK??!!??
Anyway, the reason why I started this thread is to see if there are others out there that realise that CD's and Digital music isn't as GREAT as they are made out to be. I'll give an example:
Recently bought an ION turntable (I wished these would have been out BEFORE I started replacing my vinyl on CD...would have cut my spending by at least half if not 3/4...I have probably more than 1000 CD's in my music library) and tonight I decided to pull out my vinyl copy of The Firm (Jimmy Page and Paul Rodgers) and test my ear to see if what I was hearing was in fact what I was hearing. Now I know that the music industry makes money over and over again by re-mastering CD's...but something wasn't sitting right with me. I put the copy of The Firm vinyl on the turntable and I feed it into the computer. Clean up the small static that I hear and that's it...no EQ and NO COMPRESSION, which is what the program suggests. I then proceed to burn CD of what I just took off of the vinyl/album. I bring the CD upstairs to a better stereo system and put the original CD that I have of The Firm...sounds blah with no "Punch" to it. I then put in the CD that I just burned from vinyl, the one with no EQ and NO COMPRESSION, and all I have to say is WOW!!!! My vinyl sounds better than my original CD did. And all of this was played on just a average sound system. I had a feeling that was true...but really haven't tested the theory until now.
Anyone else out there a Music GEEK??!!??
Comment