Help support the Mego Museum
Help support the Mego Museum

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Beowulf!!!!!

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Vortigern99
    Scholar/Gentleman/Weirdo
    • Jul 2, 2006
    • 1539

    Beowulf!!!!!

    This movie is amazing. Forget all the cynical fun-killers who said it sucked. They weren't paying attention! This is one of the best, most bizarre, expectation-shattering, visually stunning genre films I have ever seen... and I've seen 'em all!

    For the literature professors out there, it cleaves so close to the 8th-century poem (translated, of course, into intelligible English) as to be almost embarrasingly faithful. I mean, seriously. Some of the stuff that happens in both the poem and this movie are just plain WEIRD.

    But that's just the first half of the movie. The second half is... the word 'breathtaking' comes to mind. Mesmerising.

    During the show, sitting in the theater behind my wife and me there was a group of snarky teenagers, who giggled and snickered like... well, snarky teenagers... throughout the first half of the film, which is admittedly somewhat cliched (13 centuries after the fact!). Then, when the story basically begins to become its own sequel, a tonal shift happens... and let me tell you, we didn't hear another peep out of those noisy kids! It was as though they each got a light slap across the face, simultaneously, and then sat there rapt along with the rest of the audience.

    This is the kind of movie I wait all year for! It's the best fantasy film since the last LOTR in 2003, and that one (IMO) stretched credibility and patience.

    Just don't take the kids, unless you (or they) don't mind witnessing acts of hideous violence perpetrated by unbelievably ghoulish monsters. Or Angelina Jolie's CGI simulacrum almost totally nude.

    Like I said, a fine film.
  • thunderbolt
    Hi Ernie!!!
    • Feb 15, 2004
    • 34211

    #2
    I'm not too impressed with the commercials, it looks like a video game.
    You must try to generate happiness within yourself. If you aren't happy in one place, chances are you won't be happy anyplace. -Ernie Banks

    Comment

    • toys2cool
      Ultimate Mego Warrior
      • Nov 27, 2006
      • 28605

      #3
      That's cool i've been wanting to watch it,I'll see if I can make it with out my wife,she says it looks too much like a cartoon
      "Time to nut up or shut up" -Tallahassee

      http://ultimatewarriorcollection.webs.com/
      My stuff on facebook Incompatible Browser | Facebook

      Comment

      • Megospidey
        Museum Webslinger
        • Jul 26, 2006
        • 5305

        #4
        It is as good as Noah says it is. Saw it with my wife (did ALOT of bribing and persuading), and she liked it too.

        It is visually stunning (although sometimes the CGI is bad) and extremely faithful to the poem. What Beowulf does at the end to slay his enemy, is well...amazing. You just have to see it to believe it.

        It's hard to imagine a story written so long ago can still capture the imagination of this generation...but this one does it.

        Comment

        • SlipperyLilSuckers
          MeGoing
          • May 14, 2003
          • 9031

          #5
          I read a cinema description of this movie this morning, I'm going to see it...specially after reading this thread...thanks Noah.

          Comment

          • Hector
            el Hombre de Acero
            • May 19, 2003
            • 31852

            #6
            I saw it and liked it...but it's not the best fantasy film since LOTR...IMO Pan's Labyrinth was much better.
            sigpic

            Comment

            • phil
              Persistent Member
              • May 11, 2007
              • 2087

              #7
              I hadn't intended to see it but I may go after reading this.

              Did anyone have to read Beowulf in school? I did in junior high. I was impressed by how old the story is but I remember most of us thought we were being tortured. We read an
              English translation of course.

              Comment

              • Vortigern99
                Scholar/Gentleman/Weirdo
                • Jul 2, 2006
                • 1539

                #8
                Hector, I agree Pan's Labyrinth is a better film, but that's a bit like comparing apples and walnuts, isn't it? Beowulf is heroic fantasy, with shining swords and mighty warriors and dragons and treasure, while P's L is a dark fairy tale, with a little girl and an alternate reality hidden behind this one, and weird creatures who beckon her to join them. Completely different genres, really.

                Comment

                • Hector
                  el Hombre de Acero
                  • May 19, 2003
                  • 31852

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Vortigern99
                  Hector, I agree Pan's Labyrinth is a better film, but that's a bit like comparing apples and walnuts, isn't it? Beowulf is heroic fantasy, with shining swords and mighty warriors and dragons and treasure, while P's L is a dark fairy tale, with a little girl and an alternate reality hidden behind this one, and weird creatures who beckon her to join them. Completely different genres, really.
                  Yes, you are right.
                  sigpic

                  Comment

                  • Vortigern99
                    Scholar/Gentleman/Weirdo
                    • Jul 2, 2006
                    • 1539

                    #10
                    Originally posted by phil
                    I hadn't intended to see it but I may go after reading this.

                    Did anyone have to read Beowulf in school? I did in junior high. I was impressed by how old the story is but I remember most of us thought we were being tortured. We read an
                    English translation of course.
                    Yes, I read part of the poem in high school and have read it at least once all the way through since then, and re-read certain passages several times over. I recommend Tolkien's translation, since it has a nice flow, and maintains the alliteration that makes the poem so characteristic of its type.

                    Comment

                    • Goblin19
                      Talkative Member
                      • May 2, 2002
                      • 6124

                      #11
                      It'a good movie, for sure. It earns every bit of its' PG-13 rating. It probably should have been R. I didn't see it in 3-D., From what I've heard from those who have, it makes the movie even better. The 3-D supposedly makes some images feel like they're right in front of you.

                      Comment

                      • Sideshow Spock
                        valar morghulis
                        • Mar 8, 2005
                        • 2859

                        #12
                        Caught the 3D version this afternoon and was VERY impressed. It's a stunning film. I'm sure I woulda liked it in 2D too, but the 3D technology combined with this CGI style make it a visual feast, to say the least. Mesmerizing stuff.

                        Comment

                        • palitoy
                          live. laugh. lisa needs braces
                          • Jun 16, 2001
                          • 59794

                          #13
                          Dying to see it, I really need to get that thing called a "baby sitter" whatever the heck that is.
                          Places to find PlaidStallions online: https://linktr.ee/Plaidstallions

                          Buy Toy-Ventures Magazine here:
                          http://www.plaidstallions.com/reboot/shop

                          Comment

                          • Sideshow Spock
                            valar morghulis
                            • Mar 8, 2005
                            • 2859

                            #14
                            The simple story does move slowly here and there, but it's nothing serious. Some of the scenes are so thrilling that when it's just people standing around talking, it can be a bit of a letdown..

                            Also, just FYI, there was a $2.50 "fee" in addition to the regular ticket cost. The newspaper said it was a fee for use of the 3D technology. The 3D glasses they provide (or that you're buying, more accurately) don't resemble the old-style red and blue ones.. the frames are black plastic that resemble wayfarer sunglasses. They fit decently enuff over regular glasses, but after two hrs of wear my ears were feeling the combined pinch.
                            Last edited by Sideshow Spock; Nov 25, '07, 7:20 PM.

                            Comment

                            • YoungOnce
                              Career Member
                              • Aug 29, 2007
                              • 966

                              #15
                              Saw it. The detail in the CGI was amazing in some places... in others, felt like a cut scene from a video game.

                              There will definately be more of these in type movies in the future, one's that won't base their models from well known actors. They can save the money on actors all-together.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              😀
                              🥰
                              🤢
                              😎
                              😡
                              👍
                              👎