New Bigfoot Pics????

[johnmiic]

I dunno. These don't look like a bear but they don't look all that great either:

Hunter's Photos Stir Bigfoot Debate - AOL News

Here's the actual website but they're getting a lot of hits and it may not always load due to heavy traffic:

http://www.bfro.net/avevid/jacobs/jacobs_photos.asp

[Comic Book Geek]

More blurry photographs! Just the evidence I need to continue laughing at bigfoot believers.

[johnmiic]

I should'a did this in the first place:






Blurry pics are all you're gonna get until a well funded, scientific expedition, with proper equiptment, is sent to document Bigfoot. Until then it's like amatuer astronomers looking for asteroids. You take what you can get.

[toys2cool]

yeah that's probably Harry from "Harry and the Hendersons" remember the family dropped him off in the end

[mitchedwards]

Gotta love the blury photos. I think I saw Elvis in that picture too.

[RG]

What kind of hunting laws do they have in Ridgway, Pa? Looks like night shots to me, here in Oregon night hunting is illegal, I wonder if someone might have a pet monkey they took out and took some photos of it by a small tree in the middle of the night.

----
Now I used to go hunting with my dad (I never cared for it much) I mostly liked being out in the woods. One time when I was about 19, I was deep in the woods (a good 30 to 40 miles from any major buildings) I saw a nice sized elk (it was deer season) so I was watching it for a good 10 mins. then all of a sudden it took off running and about 10 seconds later I saw "something" I'm not saying it was Bigfoot, but it wasn't a normal thing to see. It came running on two legs and looked to be about the same height as the elk. It was a good 100 yards away, with just a small spot where the brush wasn't thick. I really, really doubt it was "Bigfoot" but seeing it did make me a "bit" more of a believer that something could be out there.

I know it could have been my eyes playing a trick on me, but one thing that I can't explain is after I lost sight of it I heard some loud cracking in the trees over in the same general area.

I'd say about 90% of me thinks that there is no Bigfoot, but the other 10% thinks there might be something out there.

-Russ

[johnmiic]

Now I used to go hunting with my dad (I never cared for it much) I mostly liked being out in the woods. One time when I was about 19, I was deep in the woods (a good 30 to 40 miles from any major buildings) I saw a nice sized elk (it was deer season) so I was watching it for a good 10 mins. then all of a sudden it took off running and about 10 seconds later I saw "something" I'm not saying it was Bigfoot, but it wasn't a normal thing to see. It came running on two legs and looked to be about the same height as the elk. It was a good 100 yards away, with just a small spot where the brush wasn't thick. I really, really doubt it was "Bigfoot" but seeing it did make me a "bit" more of a believer that something could be out there.

I know it could have been my eyes playing a trick on me, but one thing that I can't explain is after I lost sight of it I heard some loud cracking in the trees over in the same general area.

I'd say about 90% of me thinks that there is no Bigfoot, but the other 10% thinks there might be something out there.

-Russ

Jeeeze Russ!!!!! I live on the east coast and will probably never see one in the woods! You see a Bigfoot in Oregon, very nearly the Bigfoot sighting capital of the USA, after Calif & Washington, and you say,"it could have been my eyes playing a trick on me..."!?!?!?! Damn dude! You saw one! Go to their website and file a report! I am reading this and ripping hair outta my head because you don't believe your own eyes!!!!

[kingdom warrior]

Gotta love the blury photos. I think I saw Elvis in that picture too.

Mitch that is Elvis!

[thunderbolt]

Is Bigfoot doing what I think he's doing in that second pic?

[Marvelmania]

You can clearly see that's no Bigfoot. It's a werewolf!

[ABMAC]

It looks like a scrawny bear with mange.

[Vortigern99]

I am a big 'believer' in Bigfoot (based primarily on the 1967 Patterson-Gimlin film), but I am also a rational skeptic. The creature in these Jacobs photos is inarguably /not/ a bear -- its proportions are completely wrong for ursine anatomy -- but it could be a human being in a suit.

If it is a suit, it's highly convincing and effective, given that it has extra-long arms (like other non-human primates), and given that there are bare patches visible under the arm (not the armpit, but along the triceps) -- exactly where one would expect little or no hair to grow.

It is decidedly not an ape of any species yet discovered (chimp, gorilla, orang or gibbon): its legs are too long and manlike. Thus, it is either 1) a guy in a really well-made suit; or 2) an as-yet unclassified non-human primate roaming the woods of rural Pennsylvania.

[Zemo]

Ok, there people in here that are scaring me!

[jemboy2004]

OMG! I see a UFO in the background too! Better get these pics on their site too.

I wonder if bigfoot is really an Alien and his ship is gonna pick him up after he takes a a big dump in PA!

[johnmiic]

OMG! I see a UFO in the background too! Better get these pics on their site too.

I wonder if bigfoot is really an Alien and his ship is gonna pick him up after he takes a a big dump in PA!

There is a small segment of Bigfoot research which does claim that this is not an undiscovered primate but an occupant or drop-off from UFO's. I don't think that's so but some have speculated that could be the case.

Anthony, you may know your bears, I certainly don't know much about bears, but it seems to me the proportions of this figure are way off for any bear. What seems to be shown in these pics is a very thin, lanky figure. The length of the arms and legs just don't seem to fit the proportions of a bear.

If anyone has seen the tv special Sasquatch: Legend Meets Science you may recall some family took video of a tall, thin, lanky Sasquatch in the woods on a holiday. This figure seems to resemble that figure more than anything else I can think of.