-
-
We were talking about it here a couple months ago:
Fantastic toy, and it's great that they tried to stay true to the whole Jumbo Machinder aesthetic, right down to how it was manufactured. I usually don't spend that much on modern toys these days, but I'm reaaaaallly tempted by this guy. -
saw it in person at the wondercon, looks very very cool but not $300 cool imho.Comment
-
Wow! $300 is a big chunk of change.
If it were just under $100 I'd be all over this.
Comment
-
yeah $100 or under would be a reasonable price range for it.Comment
-
ah, Just saw it in the new juxtapoz magazine. It's hard to break a story around here.We were talking about it here a couple months ago:
Fantastic toy, and it's great that they tried to stay true to the whole Jumbo Machinder aesthetic, right down to how it was manufactured. I usually don't spend that much on modern toys these days, but I'm reaaaaallly tempted by this guy.Comment
-
saw this a couple weeks ago. 300 is way too much.sigpicComment
-
I can get a lot of hookers for $300.
Oops. Gotta stop this impulsive posting....
Seriously. Great toy, but they'd sell a ton of these at $100. Spread the joy people, let all of us get one!.
.
.
"When things are at their darkest, it's a brave man that can kick back and party."Comment
-
Too pricey for a modern toy
SammyComment
-
I dunno.
I agree it is expensive. But so is a Hot Toys 1:6 movie character.
trading off. cloth goods and lifelike articulation for a 2 foot stormtrooper that shoots his fist at you. I can see some folks dropping the coin on this.
It will be interesting to see what the secondary market does to it, thoComment
-
Considering the fact that it's a very small company doing a limited run, production costs for something like this, licensing fees, etc. I'm sure it would have been impossible for them to do this at a $100 price point. Anyway, Jumbo collectors are used to paying a lot for toys, so I'm sure this will sell just fine.
Comment
Tweet
Comment