The Mego Museum needs your help!
The Mego Museum needs your help!

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Paris Hilton Sues over "that's Hot" greeting card

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • toys2cool
    replied
    well who knows maybe she needs the money right? Please

    Leave a comment:


  • theantiquetiger
    replied
    As much as I cannot stand the "vaginal cleaning device" and turn the channels when ever she is mentioned on TV, she has a very valid suit. They are using her image and her trademarked "catch phrase" to make money.

    Period.

    Leave a comment:


  • Meule
    replied
    How can you trademark "That's hot", it's hardly a catchphrase. And I don't think a cartoon is a violation of her rights either. After all, she's a public figure. Either way, Vinny said it best

    Leave a comment:


  • RG
    replied
    Originally posted by kresge1
    She is such "vaginal cleaning device"
    That's the first time I've ever seen someone use something with the word "clean" in it to describe Paris Hilton

    Leave a comment:


  • kresge1
    replied
    She is such "vaginal cleaning device"

    Leave a comment:


  • Paris Hilton Sues over "that's Hot" greeting card

    Paris Hilton Sues Over 'That's Hot' Card
    Sept. 8, 2007, 3:05 AM EST

    The Associated Press

    LOS ANGELES -- Paris Hilton is suing over the use of her picture and catchphrase "That's hot" on a greeting card. Hilton sued Hallmark Cards Inc. in U.S. District Court seeking an injunction and unspecified damages to be determined at trial.

    According to the lawsuit filed Thursday, the card is titled "Paris's First Day as a Waitress" and shows a photo of Hilton's face on a cartoon of a waitress serving a plate of food to a patron. In a dialogue bubble she says, "Don't touch that, it's hot." The customer cartoon asks, "What's hot?" She answers, "That's hot."

    The suit says Hilton owns the trademark "That's hot," which was registered on Feb. 13, 2007.

    Photos: Paris Hilton

    The lawsuit claims commercial appropriation of identity, invasion of privacy, misappropriation of publicity, false representation that Hilton endorses the product, and infringement of a federally registered trademark. The damages would be based on profits from the $2.49 cards, said Hilton attorney Brent Blakely.

    Hallmark defended the card as parody, which is normally protected under fair-use law.

    "Some of Hallmark's new humor greeting cards are parodies of today's most popular celebrities and politicians," said Hallmark spokeswoman Julie O'Dell in an e-mailed statement.

    "These cards take a satirical look at news and gossip surrounding these public figures, including Paris Hilton, and we do not believe Hallmark has violated any of Ms. Hilton's rights," she said.

    Just my opinion but......that's NOT hot.
Working...
😀
🥰
🤢
😎
😡
👍
👎