I don't believe it's possible for human beings to have unconditional love for other human beings with the exception of your children. If someone can honestly say they have unconditional love for their spouse, significant other, parents, or any other human being on the planet with the exception of their children, I salute you because I don't think it is humanly possible.
avoiding the easy "copout" and accepting the challenge of being a responsible human--
--the measure of a man (or woman) so to speak (in this context) is to OVERCOME the
easy copout of such spiteful and self-centered actions as displayed by Helmsley in order
to better society (which starts "at home"/with your own family)
Sure, its easier to love your dog more than your grandkids if you so choose
(as explained earlier, a dog's love is unconditional, thus easier to reciprocate)-
--but its also detrimental behavior towards humanity----really, is THAT the kind of
example we want to pass down to future generations----that housepets should be
taken care of first before fellow human beings???---No, of course not
"If you pick up a starving dog and make him prosperous, he will not bite you. This is the principal difference between a dog and a man."
--Mark Twain
--Mark Twain
depravity of men----yes---but, in my opinion, that's ALL that quote stands for.
----sure, man has the capacity to be quite evil----but man also has the capacity to
be good, and do great things
That potential has to be FED ------and not RIDICULED by such actions as Helmsley's will
----a will which left her dog a fortune ---and her human legacy nothing
Comment