Yep. However, I bet most people can't glance at it and read it. Heck, I can't and I wrote it.
The original statement contains 121 words. 81 of those are 1,2,3, or 4 letters.
Even though the author of this forwarded email didn't follow his/her own rules and scrambled 3 letter words (you can't scramble a three letter word AND have the first and last letter be the same as the original....no way "Cambridge Uni" missed that one), a 4 letter word only requires switching the middle letters. That's not a challenge. That means 67% of this message is easily decoded.
Now, there are 13 five letter words. 5 letter words are not a challenge, given the rules. That means 78% of this message is easily decoded.
That leaves 27 words that are 6 plus letters. You can get 22% of any short message without much difficulty, if you are working from context (and provided the message makes sense). AND one of those words "rscheearch" did not fall within the rules and your brain still allowed you to read it. ("researcher", but I bet you glossed over that at first glance, like me, and read it as "research" then moved on. It wouldn't have changed the context.)
The original statement contains 121 words. 81 of those are 1,2,3, or 4 letters.
Even though the author of this forwarded email didn't follow his/her own rules and scrambled 3 letter words (you can't scramble a three letter word AND have the first and last letter be the same as the original....no way "Cambridge Uni" missed that one), a 4 letter word only requires switching the middle letters. That's not a challenge. That means 67% of this message is easily decoded.
Now, there are 13 five letter words. 5 letter words are not a challenge, given the rules. That means 78% of this message is easily decoded.
That leaves 27 words that are 6 plus letters. You can get 22% of any short message without much difficulty, if you are working from context (and provided the message makes sense). AND one of those words "rscheearch" did not fall within the rules and your brain still allowed you to read it. ("researcher", but I bet you glossed over that at first glance, like me, and read it as "research" then moved on. It wouldn't have changed the context.)
Comment