Being a somewhat historic city, I doubt they could/would move it, but they should start putting a halt to where new construction can occur. Up here in Southern Alberta we get flooding along the Bow, Elbow, and Highwood Rivers every few years. Finally, after the big flood of 05', the banks started making it very difficult to get a mortgage to buy a home along the river fronts, and many insurance companies wont sell you home insurance if you insist on living in such an area. The idea has expanded into homes on hill sides, near railroad tracks, etc....Slowly, this convinces people to move into safer areas, or end up biting the bullet and accept they live in a dangerous area and nobodies going to keep bailing them out with handouts. Of course, most folks up here who live along the water, on hillsides, etc., are not poor by any means and can usually fend for themselves monetarily if they need too.
In the case of New Orleans, I just saw on the news were many of the old ***** still havent been properly repaired (many date back to the civil war era?). Some are still just sand....What the heck? In this modern era, and in light of what has happened with Katrina, you would think they could build better ***** and water walls...Cheaper than rebuilding the city ever year I would imagine!
In the case of New Orleans, I just saw on the news were many of the old ***** still havent been properly repaired (many date back to the civil war era?). Some are still just sand....What the heck? In this modern era, and in light of what has happened with Katrina, you would think they could build better ***** and water walls...Cheaper than rebuilding the city ever year I would imagine!
Comment