Help support the Mego Museum
Help support the Mego Museum

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Green Lantern reaction

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • madmarva
    Talkative Member
    • Jul 7, 2007
    • 6445

    Green Lantern reaction

    Saw Green Lantern this afternoon. The movie's not great, but it is certainly better than what some of the reviews would lead one to believe.

    If you go into it to have a good time and don't nitpick it to death, you'll likely have a good time if you are a fan of the character and concepts and super heroes in general.

    I think Reynolds is fine in the part and effects are excellent. If you have problems with Reynolds going into the movie, you'll probably have them coming out. But as I stated before I thought he was fine.

    I had no problem with the costume. It looks good on screen. i figured Blake Lively would be a major liability, but she's actually decent.

    The script plays Hal Jordan's cocksure attitude as a front or a coping mechanism for underlying fear. I guess that goes along with Geoff Johns' reinterpretation of the character but it comes off as a Raynor-ization of the character that doesn't really work for me, but may make him more compelling to a larger audience. To me, Jordan is a bit like Wolverine. He's the best and he knows it and doesn't try to hide it. That's not the Jordan of this film, though.

    The film is one of those movies where the pieces are better than the whole. It doesn't really flow that well as some critics noted. I'm guessing director Martin Campbell and the film's editor could have use more time in post production to work out some of the kinks. The script does seem a little patchwork. But some of the individual pieces are so good that I really didn't mind. There really are some very cool mind-blowing sequences in the movie that I've never seen on the big screen before.

    Abin Sur, Kilowog, Tomar-Re and Sinestro are excellent and the opening scenes were quite unexpected by me. The film has a serious tone and could be scary for kids under the age of 8 and even for ones who are older depending on their disposition. Hector Hammond is creepy and has a transformation scene that could scare some little kids with his head growing and bones cracking, reminiscent of the key transformation scene in "The Howling."


    I do think the film suffers from being the third super hero film in a 6- to 8-week period. Had GL opened when Thor did, I believe the reviews wouldn't have been as tough. I think critics are suffering from a bit of super-hero fatigue.

    But if you are a Green Lantern fan, it's really cool to see all the concepts you've read about over the years played out on the screen. It's very true to the lore, particularly as retooled by Johns. Stay for an excellent teaser scene following the credits.

    It reminds me a lot of the first X-Men movie in that so much of it was right, but other things could have been better. I think GL 2 will be better and I think it's a good thing Campbell is bowing out after this one to open the door for another director who is more adept at working with fantasy elements and CGI.

    If you are a Green Lantern fan, I suggest you go to movie and just have a good time. Take the movie for what it's worth and unlike me, don't try to be an arm-chair critic.

    There is a ton of cool stuff in this movie and whatever it lacks, the final after-the-credit scene will fire you up for the sequel.
    Last edited by madmarva; Jun 17, '11, 8:08 PM.
  • Earth 2 Chris
    Verbose Member
    • Mar 7, 2004
    • 32966

    #2
    Wow, you and I had much of the same reaction to this,which I posted simultaneously in the "Whose Seen GL" thread. Especially on the comparison to X-Men 1 and the thought of a better sequel.

    I didn't really have a problem with the plot. It may have been a bit choppy, but I think a LOT of movies are like that nowadays. As modern movies go, it was pretty coherent, I thought.

    Chris
    sigpic

    Comment

    • madmarva
      Talkative Member
      • Jul 7, 2007
      • 6445

      #3
      Cool. it wasn't the plot as much as the editing or the transitions in the film that seemed a little rough.

      The movie is good. it's just isn't as good as it might have been. However, there was a lot of ground to plow, laying the foundation for the movie.

      I have no clue how people will react to this at the box office. I have a feeling like Batman Begins did, this movie might really get its legs on DVD/Blu Ray.

      I want to see it again, and i could see kids watching this over and over on DVD or even going back to the movie theater over and over.

      Plus I think the GL cartoon that is coming out in the fall or next year will only make the characters more popular.

      If I were warners i would see if the guy who directed the last few Harry Potters would want a crack at the sequel and I would lighten up just a bit on the scary stuff to draw in more kids.

      I'd give the movie a 2.75 stars or B- type grade. but as a GL fan, I'm kinda thrilled they got so much of it right.
      Last edited by madmarva; Jun 17, '11, 8:45 PM.

      Comment

      • Earth 2 Chris
        Verbose Member
        • Mar 7, 2004
        • 32966

        #4
        Yeah, the transitions are the typical post-MTV quick jumps, but that's pretty much standard nowadays. I didn't really get too jarred by it, but I see what you mean.

        I was thinking of Batman Begins too. It did decent business in theaters, but really cleaned up on DVD once word got out that the stink of the Schumacher films had been wiped clean.

        Chris
        sigpic

        Comment

        Working...
        😀
        🥰
        🤢
        😎
        😡
        👍
        👎