Daredevil Black Widow Movie

[The Bat]

Besides, comicbook fans can accept reinterpretations of certain aspects of
their favorite comicbook heroes in the COMICS....why can't the same fans
loosen up and accept those tweaks in the MOVIES...an entirely different
medium?

Sorry...I can bend a little, but not break. I can't accept Batman/Bruce Wayne as a middle aged balding little RUNT! Keaton...WAS NOT BATMAN!

[PNGwynne]

I liked DareDevil....and it was still better than any of the first 4 Batman Movies.

I LOVED the DD director's cut--a whole different movie, and just as good as
Spidey 1 & 3...

[samurainoir]

I should go catch the DD director's cut at some point. I've heard from quite a few people that it flows better than the theatrical.

[kingdom warrior]

I should go catch the DD director's cut at some point. I've heard from quite a few people that it flows better than the theatrical.

Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay better!!

[The Bat]

I should go catch the DD director's cut at some point. I've heard from quite a few people that it flows better than the theatrical.

The Director's cut is much better. The extra half hour made a big difference. My biggest complaint was they tried to cram to much story line into a 90 minute Movie. That and Gardner was a terrible Elektra...couldn't they have found a Greek Girl(or at least one who looked Greek?).

[BlackKnight]

Sorry Hue I do value your opinion not discrediting it in any way......sorry that post was funny....

Sorry ..., I can't say I even value anything on the Subject at Hand .
What Hue doesn't now about a good Super Hero Movie, could fill a Wearhouse. and that is infact my Opinion on the Subject.

[samurainoir]

For what it's worth, I agree with Huedell that a Terry Zwigoff film like Ghost World is much more interesting than most of the Superhero films out there, which probably says more about the state of Hollywood creativity than anything else.

I actually think that the best comic book adaptations have been outside of the Capes and Tights genre. Persepolis, History of Violence, Road to Perdition (despite of the fact that they cast Tom Hanks instead of Gabriel Byrne, who would have been perfect), and even Sin City, all pushed certain cinematic boundaries.

[BlackKnight]

I agree with Huedell that a Terry Zwigoff film like Ghost World is much more interesting than most of the Superhero films out there

That's not being Debated ..., What Hue Know's about Good Super Hero Movies is.

[huedell]

Sorry ..., I can't say I even value anything on the Subject at Hand .
What Hue doesn't now about a good Super Hero Movie, could fill a Wearhouse. and that is infact my Opinion on the Subject.

You are way too comitted to those "superhero" movies....the ones you LIKE
annnnd the ones you DISLIKE.

Then again, I guess I'd feel the same way if people were devaluing
SHAWSHANK REDEMPTION or AMERICAN BEAUTY in any way.

Whatever.

[huedell]

For what it's worth, I agree with Huedell that a Terry Zwigoff film like Ghost World is much more interesting than most of the Superhero films out there, which probably says more about the state of Hollywood creativity than anything else.

I actually think that the best comic book adaptations have been outside of the Capes and Tights genre. Persepolis, History of Violence, Road to Perdition (despite of the fact that they cast Tom Hanks instead of Gabriel Byrne, who would have been perfect), and even Sin City, all pushed certain cinematic boundaries.

A freakin' MEN.

[huedell]

Sorry...I can bend a little, but not break. I can't accept Batman/Bruce Wayne as a middle aged balding little RUNT! Keaton...WAS NOT BATMAN!

Really?

Apparently he was....for thousands of fans.

KUDOS for Keaton as BATMAN...hair-challenged or not.

[huedell]

Sorry Hue I do value your opinion not discrediting it in any way......sorry that post was funny....

Well, it just seemed like a simple jab at my authenticity.

As far as tickilng your funny bone...I guess you should take it where ya can get it

[thunderbolt]

I acknowledge there's a whole "true to the comic" aspect that many
comic fans here have come into play, but to me that's a non-factor.
A movie I like is a good movie, a movie I don't like is a bad movie...comicbook
accuracy has nothing to do with it to me.

Besides, comicbook fans can accept reinterpretations of certain aspects of
their favorite comicbook heroes in the COMICS....why can't the same fans
loosen up and accept those tweaks in the MOVIES...an entirely different
medium?

Not sure what comic fans you know, but most of the ones I've run into have a really hard time accepting change. Most like the same old same old.

[huedell]

Not sure what comic fans you know, but most of the ones I've run into have a really hard time accepting change. Most like the same old same old.

Kinda...but from what I can tell, the majority have stuck with the same titles
and characters for decades that have displayed a lot more variations
on a character than one movie could ever accomplish.

Either way, the boatload of complaints over silly details
in movie adaptations have always been there for all to see.

[thunderbolt]

^^^ Yeah, but the y whine like crazy when its a change from the status quo. See Batman, Captain America and the Punisher for examples.