I was in midtown comics the other in NYC killing time before i had to go to a meeting. I had not been in a comic shop in months because i had decided not to buy any comics for the time being. I came across Kingdom come Special number one and since I had read the original run i decided to buy it.
While i was at the shop I looked at the other projects he was involved with.
SuperPowers, Avengers/Invaders and whatever covers he's done for DC. Now I've been a big Fan over the years with his work...but when he did that 12 issue run with the justice league it left me a bit disappointed.
To be honest his work is starting to look the same. I see the same poses over and over....and just not exciting anymore.
Now I took the Kingdom Come special and read it. It was his first time writing and inking his own work...
I wasn't crazy about it. Nor did I like the computer coloring over his inked halftones. I looked at his thumbnails which were great but i sat there and couldn't understand why he needs to shoot photo reference after that.
Then he put a disclaimer that he draws the pictures by eye and not lightboxed or projected which honestly i don't care how he does it. Norman Rockwell who Ross is like. Projected and traced over his photographs to make some of the greatest paintings ever.
So anyway I was thinking Ross has made his mark on the industry no doubt. But unlike the legends of the industry such as Kirby and Neal Adams, Eisner He's constantly reworking another masters vision...and Yes it's great but does that make him a true Master of the medium or is he just a really good painter who paints other peoples Ideas and Superheroes?
My Question do you think he's overated or not?
While i was at the shop I looked at the other projects he was involved with.
SuperPowers, Avengers/Invaders and whatever covers he's done for DC. Now I've been a big Fan over the years with his work...but when he did that 12 issue run with the justice league it left me a bit disappointed.
To be honest his work is starting to look the same. I see the same poses over and over....and just not exciting anymore.
Now I took the Kingdom Come special and read it. It was his first time writing and inking his own work...
I wasn't crazy about it. Nor did I like the computer coloring over his inked halftones. I looked at his thumbnails which were great but i sat there and couldn't understand why he needs to shoot photo reference after that.
Then he put a disclaimer that he draws the pictures by eye and not lightboxed or projected which honestly i don't care how he does it. Norman Rockwell who Ross is like. Projected and traced over his photographs to make some of the greatest paintings ever.
So anyway I was thinking Ross has made his mark on the industry no doubt. But unlike the legends of the industry such as Kirby and Neal Adams, Eisner He's constantly reworking another masters vision...and Yes it's great but does that make him a true Master of the medium or is he just a really good painter who paints other peoples Ideas and Superheroes?
My Question do you think he's overated or not?
Comment