The Mego Museum needs your help!
The Mego Museum needs your help!

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

WGSH Versus DC Retro-Action: Rate of Inflation

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • EMCEtoys
    replied
    Originally posted by kryptosmaster
    Unfortunately you picked two bad examples of items that are far overpriced or a volatile commodity.
    It wasn't that long ago that gas dropped down to almost a buck a gallon so where would that fit in your example?
    Comics are vastly overpriced for their value.

    If you use the CPI Inflation calculator:
    1974 comic book 25 cents
    2010 dollars: $1.11
    and that's about what they are worth.
    1974 gallon of gas 53 cents
    2010 dollars: $2.35 and gas is $2.60 around me not $3.50
    1974 Mego figure. you say $3, I've seen sales as low as 99 cents but we'll give you $3 although I expect most sold in the $2 range.
    2010 $3 figure: $13.28


    Rich
    While I don't want to get pulled into the quicksand of a mathematical argument, I have to say that these calculations don't take into account the change in costs of the individual processes, equipment or materials that go into them.

    but the statement about an overpriced commodity is a spot-on observation of an overall trend.

    Leave a comment:


  • ctc
    replied
    >Mego sold more than one million Action Jacksons in 1972, one could conjecture that Superman would fair even better.

    It’s interesting that they sold so many AJs, considering he was kind of a blip on the toy radar. I don’t remember him being around all that long, and I remember him being cleared out pretty early on. ‘Course THAT’S interesting considering AJ himself was the progenitor for so much toy-ness. I guess he was a success (since a toy that lasted more than a year at the time was considered pretty good) but I’m betting he got overshadowed by later tie-in lines; like the apes, or super heroes.

    The new retro toys are in a weird spot: they’re not quite real toys for kids, not quite collectors items. (Toys would be cheaper and more stripped down, like molded outfits and fewer joints; collectibles would probably go the hyper-detail route, since they wouldn’t be intended for a lot of manhandling.) The PRIMARY audience seems to be older collector types.... but older, collector types interested in toys for the kids. It’s like Mattel wants to see what wins out.

    $20 is a weird price point: it’s a NOTICEABLE amount, precluding impulse buys; but it’s low enough that someone wouldn’t mind shelling it out every month or so. I could see it going either way, depending on who Mattel decides the audience is: coming down as runs increase if they’re considered toys; going up as detail and tooling is increased if they’re considered collectibles.

    Don C.

    Leave a comment:


  • Werewolf
    replied
    Originally posted by ODBJBG
    This isn't true at all. MOTUC is in TRU right now loaded down with crummy DCUC repacks that nobody wants.
    Mattel didn't choose to keep MOTU out of retail. Stores wouldn't take it. The Toys R Us 2 packs are a test to see if they can sell at retail again.

    Leave a comment:


  • livnxxxl
    replied
    Originally posted by Sandman9580
    That, and the progressively higher cost of executive compensation.
    FINALLY some one else here besides me can see the point I have been making all this time.

    Leave a comment:


  • ODBJBG
    replied
    Originally posted by Werewolf
    After the retail disaster that was the 2002 MOTU reboot, retailers wouldn't touch MOTU. Toy makers can't sell what stores refuse to order.
    This isn't true at all. MOTUC is in TRU right now loaded down with crummy DCUC repacks that nobody wants. Mattel deliberately chose to keep MOTUC out of retail, because it was too big of a risk for them. Not because Retailers wouldn't bite. Mattel just didn't want to put up the dough that they would have to front for a retail line. It would have meant that Mattel would have had to have several waves ready to be tooled.

    Mattel knows that internally, they aren't capable of proper distribution to make a line like MOTUC work. They knew that after they failed so hard with 200X. Retailers didn't object to MOTUC and actually, Mattel has even said that. They chose MOTUC for MattyCollector as opposed to going retail, not the reverse.

    As we're seeing with several lines that "must be online exclusive" Mattel has no problem repainting these figures into less popular decos and selling them at TRU. Both MOTUC and Ghostbusters will be in TRU this year... With hinderances in terms of deco, but are still able to go retail. Mattel knows exactly what it's doing.

    Leave a comment:


  • boynightwing
    replied
    In Canada it costs 10 bucks to get Marvel and or Star Wars 3 3/4 figures so I don't think 20 is out of line.

    Leave a comment:


  • jwyblejr
    replied
    Something else we need to consider,Mattel pretty much had to do these from scratch. I would think that has to factor into the price somewhere. Mego more or less kit bashed the WGSH stuff,that might be why they were cheaper.

    Leave a comment:


  • Werewolf
    replied
    Originally posted by kryptosmaster
    I was ahead of the curve in voicing my concerns on this line and was semi-ostracized for my OPINION.
    No one is ostracized for an opinion.

    People have been called out for being rude or wording their opinions very poorly. Like saying things like the people that made the dolls should kill themselves or comparing a doll that they don't like to being raped. That kind of stuff is obviously totally out of out of line and show a lack of perspective to put it mildly.

    You can look at the economics of production runs and licensing fees but what ultimately matters is what a toy is worth to you. Worth $20, Buy it. Not worth $20, don't. Because that is what they cost and are going to cost.

    I personally think the $20 is a fair price for them considering the low production runs and what has to be a fairly high licensing fee. But I still don't buy them because I'm not that into superheroes. If I have $20 to spend and my choice is Retro Action Two Face or Monster High Cleo, I'm going to get Cleo.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sandman9580
    replied
    Originally posted by palitoy
    Is $20 too high? Yeah, I think $17.99 would be better but every Mattel DC comics line is about $2-$3 too expensive IMO. I think it says a lot about the high cost of licensing these days.
    That, and the progressively higher cost of executive compensation.

    Leave a comment:


  • rlkrefft
    replied
    Kids may not know all the foes (besides Batman ones and Lex Luthor) but they all know the heroes. Between The Batman cartoon,Justice League and that new Super Friends show I'm certain the major DC heroes are pretty well known to most kids. O.k. maybe not guys like Spectre or Red Tornado or Zatanna but the original silver age JLA members are all pretty famous and all the Supes/Bats sidekicks. Unless the kids are living in an over protective home where parents shelter them from most tv. I can see kids wanting these figures but I can't see parents paying $20.00 a pop for them. I have 2 of each wave 1 and 2 and 2 Green Arrows. Keep one of each on display and one of each carded. I don't mind the price point but I do wish for the price the bodies were a bit better (so they could at least stand straight) for $20.00 I expect a little better. Megos could stand straight at $2.99.lol

    Leave a comment:


  • Astronut
    replied
    Originally posted by megomania
    Meh. Let's see - I bought (4) GA's, (2) ea of the rest of Wave 1, and (1) ea so far of Wave 2...only because my local TRU's don't have them yet. Once they arrive I'm buying (1) more of each. And so on, and so on, and so on of the upcoming waves.

    So count me out of your poll
    I wasn't taking a poll but thanks for your awesome commentary.

    Leave a comment:


  • Zemo
    replied
    There is no way these were made for mass market to kids. Kids today don't even know who half these characters are. It's niche market that they will make a few bucks on, good for them for doing it. I personally think the price should be about 15.00, but what do I know. Like some else said, kids are paying 9.99 for a lump of metal or plastic.

    I do believe niche or not, at 20 bucks they should work out the basic problems, lighting fast. That's just poor business and leaves a bad taste in peoples mouths.

    Leave a comment:


  • tllgn
    replied
    i think that 19.99 is a fair price for retro mego ,well emce figures of course,at the time the prices were from 2.99 to 5.99,depending on where you went,the most average price that i recall through 1973-1980,it also depended on what line you went for ,and what store,was 3.99,and given inflation for the last thirty years ,it certainly still a good deal today,remember the comic price of just .25,and today they can go for 2.99 or more.its a fair deal.

    Leave a comment:


  • jwyblejr
    replied
    Originally posted by Meule
    So what's stopping Mattel from doing that? And selling these worldwide?
    Wal-Mart would be my answer. They're very picky about what they carry. Look at the G.I. Joe:Pursuit of Cobra stuff. TRU and Target carry them but does Wal-Mart? No.

    Leave a comment:


  • LovethoseMegos
    replied
    I won't buy them not due to the price, but because of the quality. If these things came on castaway bodies I'd buy triples. I'm not going to be a lemming like those who support these poorly made figures.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
😀
🥰
🤢
😎
😡
👍
👎