Well aren't a lot of the heads, bodies and accessories molded from original Mego parts? And isn't the custom shark also molded from an original Mego shark? Without an identifying mark like DM or FTC a lot of these pieces look a lot like originals, figuring out who used what to mold what could get pretty hard I guess. They very easily could of molded theirs from an original as well, or they could of used the custom one that was molded from the original to prototype theirs. Not sure how anyone would know either way.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
FTC just posted prototype Great White Shark pics on FB
Collapse
X
-
-
Well aren't a lot of the heads, bodies and accessories molded from original Mego parts? And isn't the custom shark also molded from an original Mego shark? Without an identifying mark like DM or FTC a lot of these pieces look a lot like originals, figuring out who used what to mold what could get pretty hard I guess. They very easily could of molded theirs from an original as well, or they could of used the custom one that was molded from the original to prototype theirs. Not sure how anyone would know either way.Comment
-
Since FTC has the license, and if they use something that was fan generated, it would be nice if they compensated the person or gave them credit, but legally they probably don't have to. Not saying they did use it, I have no idea. My main point was that it may be really hard to tell if they did or didn't unless there was something slightly different on the custom that FTC might recreate without knowing it wasn't on the original. If the custom looks exactly like the original in every way, how could we possibly tell whether FTC used it or an original to create their prototype?My posts were needlessly deleted ...Comment
-
The shark is generic and was never part of a DC license, thus the ownership or patent would belong to Mego. However, with Mego being out of business for 30 years, it basically doesn't matter.
Same goes with the Mego bodies where pretty much anyone can produce them.
A bootlegger doesn't technically own anything.Expectation is the death of discovery.Comment
-
That would be a beginning toward explaining why FTC did such a ****-poor job on the female figure's faces. I expect the rest to have been laziness because they were dealing with female figures that they didn't expect much of a response to. Shame on them for that!Comment
-
Type Two: The Mego body, not the disease.Comment
-
I worked on a tribute CD to an artist that was killed in an accident, his band finished the album he had demoed. They asked my brother and I to find a bootleg of the artist playing a song in concert that he had never recorded in the studio. We found a soundboard recording and sent it to them and gave them the name of the person that had 'bootlegged' the show so he would get credit. They used the recording but wouldn't give the person credit since he had bootlegged them without permission in the first place. Since they owned the copyright and the bootlegger didn't, they could do whatever they wanted with it and the bootlegger had really no legs to stand on legally. I felt like they should have credited him even if they legally didn't have to, it would have been nice.
Since FTC has the license, and if they use something that was fan generated, it would be nice if they compensated the person or gave them credit, but legally they probably don't have to. Not saying they did use it, I have no idea. My main point was that it may be really hard to tell if they did or didn't unless there was something slightly different on the custom that FTC might recreate without knowing it wasn't on the original. If the custom looks exactly like the original in every way, how could we possibly tell whether FTC used it or an original to create their prototype?Comment
Comment