Help support the Mego Museum
Help support the Mego Museum

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Stan Lee has apparently fallen on hard times?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • huedell
    Museum Ball Eater
    • Dec 31, 2003
    • 11069

    #16
    Is Stan Lee despised by some because of jealousy? Yeah probably.

    This has always been a sore spot for me... I think people like Stan Lee put out efforts that or may not be equal to those of a Kirby/Ditko, but inarguably a guy like Lee takes on most of the risk, and is inevitably eternally crucified for that no matter HOW true his intentions are.

    Believe me when I say I happily default my final judgement to include the takes of those like certain individuals posting here who have followed Lee's/Marvel's exploits in real time since the 70's, but my gut says Lee couldn't win in the hearts of many no matter WHAT tact he took.
    "No. No no no no no no. You done got me talkin' politics. I didn't wanna'. Like I said y'all, I'm just happy to be alive. I think I'll scoot over here right by this winda', let this beautiful carriage rock me to sleep, and dream about how lucky I am." - Chris Mannix

    Comment

    • Hedji
      Citizen of Gotham
      • Nov 17, 2012
      • 7246

      #17
      Would this be an appropriate place to ask (because I truly don't know), in a few sentences, what precisely are peoples' beef with Stan about? I guess I'm naive and always pictured him as a kindly comic book father figure who is enthusiastic about the heroes he wrote about. Can anyone distill down why he is hated?

      Comment

      • Iron Mego
        Wake Up Heavy
        • Jan 31, 2010
        • 3532

        #18
        Because folks like Jack Kirby didn't get compensated or credited the way they should have.

        Many complain that Stan took sole credit for the creation of many characters, and artists got paid day or page rates for the work they did.

        From the little I've read about Kirby he had to fight to even be able to sell originals at conventions to make some extra money.

        This is a very basic, and probably inaccurate, summary of the very convoluted history of Marvel comics.
        Wake Up Heavy Podcast

        Find me on Twitter

        Comment

        • palitoy
          live. laugh. lisa needs braces
          • Jun 16, 2001
          • 59204

          #19
          That's it, by and large, Stan's campaigning to have comics be an art form and listing himself as the creator of _______ (even though he never shied from crediting the artists) are viewed by many as an ego trip.

          Not to mention that his twilight years saw him happy, famous and wealthy while Kirby died without the true recognition or compensation he deserved.

          I've actually had some decent conversations with people about why they love/loathe the man. Most of the time, it's totally civil and it can be an interesting debate. However lately, like everything else, it's turned into a politicized minefield of two sides unwilling to hear the other viewpoint.
          Places to find PlaidStallions online: https://linktr.ee/Plaidstallions

          Buy Toy-Ventures Magazine here:
          http://www.plaidstallions.com/reboot/shop

          Comment

          • Earth 2 Chris
            Verbose Member
            • Mar 7, 2004
            • 32498

            #20
            It's definitely the Kirby angle more than anything. Kirby's importance was marginalized, all the while Stan still called him "King" and basically had him set the style of the books. But they wouldn't pay him, or give him a salaried job. And just shortly after Kirby left, they did the same things for guys like John Romita, who got that life-long position and stability Kirby so desperately wanted. Kirby even sided against fellow Golden Age creator Carl Burgos' claim on the Human Torch for Marvel, thinking they'd repay the favor. They didn't. And Stan apparently never went to bat for him with his relative Martin Goodman, who owned the company.

            The Marvel method itself comes into play too, as to who did what. Was Stan heavily plotting the books with guys like Kirby and Ditko, or did he just give them a rough idea like "The FF fight Doctor Doom", leaving the artists to write and pace the story, for him to dialog later. This did indeed happen more frequently toward the end of his collaborations with Kirby and Ditko, but the question is when did this method REALLY start? When did Stan get so busy he was only really scripting other's stories? This all ties back into how much credit he took, or had applied to him, as he campaigned for comics-as-artform.

            Chris
            sigpic

            Comment

            • Makernaut
              Persistent Member
              • Jul 22, 2015
              • 1546

              #21
              I have read a lot from Mark Evanier on the subject over the years and he would know.... probably better than anyone on the planet (outside of Kirby/Ditko/Lee, of course). He's a guy that was around for a lot of it and has worked for both Kirby and Lee and corresponded with Ditko. Evanier has a pretty realistic take on it in my opinion, and it is consistently the middle road where it was always a collaboration, sometimes more Lee and sometimes more Kirby, but it was always a joint effort. As with all collaborations, the details as to who came up with what are always going to be murky. That's the way it works in all kinds of collaborative works: who really knows and when getting it straight from the horses' mouth...well, all of us like to be the hero of our own story so of course credit for who did EXACTLY what is going to be somewhat distorted. Also, Evanier has noted that in specific cases where one would be absolutely sure that it was Kirby (or Lee), there is concrete evidence that it was in fact, Lee (or Kirby). His bottom line is that both of them "have / had notoriously poor memories" and that "Lee-Kirby creations are Lee-Kirby creations".

              https://www.newsfromme.com/writings/the-jack-faq/

              Comment

              • Hedji
                Citizen of Gotham
                • Nov 17, 2012
                • 7246

                #22
                Thanks for the responses fellas. Sounds like sort of a Bill Finger thing.

                I guess I've always admired the persona for so long. His was the voice inside my head reading all the yellow boxed narration. It's hard to hear that talent like Kirby was unappreciated or unfairly compensated. We will never know if Marvel would've come to be without Kirby or Ditko, but I'm reasonably certain it wouldn't have been the same without Stan Lee.

                I think it's safe to assume Steve Ditko probably wasn't an easy person to work with. I must confess, I really don't know much about Kirby the man. What kind of temperament was he known for? Gentle? Combative? I just wonder what kind of personalities clashed or gelled to birth the alchemy that became the Marvel style.

                Comment

                • Makernaut
                  Persistent Member
                  • Jul 22, 2015
                  • 1546

                  #23
                  Originally posted by Hedji
                  I must confess, I really don't know much about Kirby the man. What kind of temperament was he known for? Gentle? Combative? I just wonder what kind of personalities clashed or gelled to birth the alchemy that became the Marvel style.
                  That link in my post above your's could answer some of your questions in regards to that. As a teen, Mark Evanier worked as an assistant to Jack and was very close to Jack and his family for years. Short answer: Jack was a very sweet and hard working man.

                  Comment

                  • Makernaut
                    Persistent Member
                    • Jul 22, 2015
                    • 1546

                    #24
                    There is some of this argument that suffers because we tend to want to apply what we know or what we assume to know NOW to how people should have behaved then. For instance, you NOW know this so Stan should have done X then and because he didn't, he's worthy of contempt. How do we know Stan knew that then? Did he have a crystal ball? You have to remember these were human beings, raised in the Depression. Their Worldview was completely different than ours. They rationalized and acted differently than what we consider to be reasonable in this day and age. Their work ethic was different and these were "funny books". And some of this is "if party A is good and was wronged, then party B was a complete tool", rather than all parties were rational human beings who might have been acting as best they could according to what they thought was reasonable.

                    I have seen interviews with Stan where he said if Jack would have just once pipped up, things could have been different. And I have read that Kirby was working in good faith and when he felt someone didn't come through for him, he could get angry and hold resentments. Heck, I know that feeling entirely. If you aren't your own advocate, people will forget very quickly because they have their own thing going on. Jack wasn't about to rock the boat by pipping up, but he was entirely disappointed that people didn't instinctively see things his way. This is a pretty basic workplace scenario really, although on a grander stage. And like all things, it's probably not a wild and interesting story unless you slap a black hat on one guy and a white hat on the other.

                    Comment

                    • PNGwynne
                      Master of Fowl Play
                      • Jun 5, 2008
                      • 19444

                      #25
                      I enjoyed the Evanier link immensely--thanks, Makernaut.
                      WANTED: Dick Grayson SI trousers; gray AJ Mustang horse; vintage RC Batman (Bruce Wayne) head; minty Wolfman tights; mint Black Knight sword; minty Launcelot boots; Lion Rock (pale) Dracula & Mummy heads; Lion Rock Franky squared boots; Wayne Foundation blue furniture; Flash Gordon/Ming (10") unbroken holsters; CHiPs gloved arms; POTA T2 tan body; CTVT/vintage Friar Tuck robes, BBP TZ Burgess Meredith glasses.

                      Comment

                      • Hedji
                        Citizen of Gotham
                        • Nov 17, 2012
                        • 7246

                        #26
                        Good stuff and well articulated, Makernaut. Thanks.

                        Comment

                        • Iron Mego
                          Wake Up Heavy
                          • Jan 31, 2010
                          • 3532

                          #27
                          Most of what I know, or think I know, of the Kirby stuff came from Evanier's book Kirby King of Comics. He definitely had an interesting life, one that many would probably envy, but he never had the financial security he so desperately wanted. Seems like he was constantly worried about how he would provide for his family.
                          Wake Up Heavy Podcast

                          Find me on Twitter

                          Comment

                          • huedell
                            Museum Ball Eater
                            • Dec 31, 2003
                            • 11069

                            #28
                            Originally posted by Makernaut
                            I have seen interviews with Stan where he said if Jack would have just once pipped up, things could have been different. ...If you aren't your own advocate, people will forget very quickly because they have their own thing going on. Jack wasn't about to rock the boat by pipping up, but he was entirely disappointed that people didn't instinctively see things his way.
                            And this notion is why I'll always have Lee's back. Even though I admit I may be backing the wrong horse, this just seems to be my reality... being outspoken is inherently going to make you a target through no fault of your own, and every fault of the introvert who clings to words like "common sense" and "politeness" as if those terms are unquestionably universal.
                            "No. No no no no no no. You done got me talkin' politics. I didn't wanna'. Like I said y'all, I'm just happy to be alive. I think I'll scoot over here right by this winda', let this beautiful carriage rock me to sleep, and dream about how lucky I am." - Chris Mannix

                            Comment

                            • palitoy
                              live. laugh. lisa needs braces
                              • Jun 16, 2001
                              • 59204

                              #29
                              Originally posted by Makernaut
                              I have seen interviews with Stan where he said if Jack would have just once pipped up, things could have been different. And I have read that Kirby was working in good faith and when he felt someone didn't come through for him, he could get angry and hold resentments. Heck, I know that feeling entirely. If you aren't your own advocate, people will forget very quickly because they have their own thing going on. Jack wasn't about to rock the boat by pipping up, but he was entirely disappointed that people didn't instinctively see things his way. This is a pretty basic workplace scenario really, although on a grander stage.
                              Yeah, he did get very resentful later in life, to the point of starting to claim "He did it all". I've experienced this in my professional life (and a super fun lawsuit) and witnessed a man I worked with say the same (he wasn't being truthful) about a collaberation that i witnessed. He felt disrepected and used, so he was lashing out. I think he was convinced he was justified. I actually feel a lot of empathy for the man, he deserved better.

                              While Jack wasn't great at sticking up for himself, I also think Lee had/has this terrible fear of conflict. That can actually cause you more problems than having the conflict. Whenever he was asked about things, he feigns this sort of ignorance that I honestly believe is sincere. He just shut down.

                              Originally posted by Makernaut
                              it's probably not a wild and interesting story unless you slap a black hat on one guy and a white hat on the other.
                              Absolutely, which is kind of ironic considering Lee/Kirby created villains with interesting motives and empathy.

                              I think a lot of it stems from the Segiel/Shuster story or the fact that Bob Kane is easy to dislike but not every story fits in that mold.


                              Just an annecdote about both men: I used to be friendly with the man who ran the Toronto Comic conventions. In 1990 we had lunch and he was getting A list guests, so I asked about the possibility of Kirby or Lee. I paraphrase but the response was "Lee is too much money" and "Kirby isn't about money, it's all about being recognized, you have to give him an award, then he'll consider it". He then told me that any "bowling trophy" he gave him seemed too insincere, so it didn't get explored.
                              Places to find PlaidStallions online: https://linktr.ee/Plaidstallions

                              Buy Toy-Ventures Magazine here:
                              http://www.plaidstallions.com/reboot/shop

                              Comment

                              • number 6
                                Village Idiot
                                • Jul 10, 2003
                                • 629

                                #30
                                Originally posted by Makernaut
                                There is some of this argument that suffers because we tend to want to apply what we know or what we assume to know NOW to how people should have behaved then. For instance, you NOW know this so Stan should have done X then and because he didn't, he's worthy of contempt. How do we know Stan knew that then? Did he have a crystal ball? You have to remember these were human beings, raised in the Depression. Their Worldview was completely different than ours. They rationalized and acted differently than what we consider to be reasonable in this day and age. Their work ethic was different and these were "funny books". And some of this is "if party A is good and was wronged, then party B was a complete tool", rather than all parties were rational human beings who might have been acting as best they could according to what they thought was reasonable.

                                I have seen interviews with Stan where he said if Jack would have just once pipped up, things could have been different. And I have read that Kirby was working in good faith and when he felt someone didn't come through for him, he could get angry and hold resentments. Heck, I know that feeling entirely. If you aren't your own advocate, people will forget very quickly because they have their own thing going on. Jack wasn't about to rock the boat by pipping up, but he was entirely disappointed that people didn't instinctively see things his way. This is a pretty basic workplace scenario really, although on a grander stage. And like all things, it's probably not a wild and interesting story unless you slap a black hat on one guy and a white hat on the other.
                                THIS ^

                                Though I have read some comic history - Evanier’s Kirby: King of Comics, Lee’s fluff autobiography, Back Issue, etc. - and while I wouldn’t claim to be an expert or well-versed on the Kirby/Lee feud, this balanced take matches my impression on the situation.

                                Both men had their flaws, both probably contributed to the problem in their own way. I don’t vilify one and pom-pom for the other.

                                Part of the problem is as you say: we have the benefit of hindsight now. Clearly, with multiple comic-inspired movies with 200-300 million dollar budgets and toy departments crammed with liscensed merchandise, we can clearly see that the work-for-hire stuff was unfair to creators. But back in the day that was business as usual. Not saying that makes it ok, but is it fair to demand either man or both should have behaved differently based on today’s sensibilities?

                                And when we start blaming them based on what we know to be “right” today, we’re engaging in a huge game of “what if”. If Stan had taken it upon himself to put his foot down for creator rights would that really have changed things? Or would Uncle Martin just have stuck Stan in a broom closet somewhere? I’m sure Stan’s critics would have loved that, but would it really have made things better for creators?

                                If Jack had actually spoke up for himself or for other creator’s rights (I thought the lawsuit involved Joe Simon, but maybe I’m misremembering) would it actually have changed things? Or would he have just gotten fired as he feared? And would getting fired from comics really be terrible? Yeah, would’ve sucked for comics, but would it perhaps have been the impetus to find a better career- maybe commercial art? - where he would have found the security he was seeking? How many of us have been let go from a job and think it’s the end of the world...only to end up at a better job?

                                We can guess and make assumptions based on our prejudices we’ll never actually how things could have played out if done differently.

                                I think another big part is that you’re seeing the “success has many fathers; falure is an orphan” in play. Reminds me of the He-Man episode of Toys That Made Us. You had 3-4 guys all absolutely adimate that they were the sole creative impetus behind the line, when it’s clear that it was a collaborative effort and all played a part.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                😀
                                🥰
                                🤢
                                😎
                                😡
                                👍
                                👎